Teams

ETC Mixers

2024 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-06vs Mister and Miss HitsWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Elwer / Dina Bostock vs Sandra Gulley / Harrison Cleveland6-3, 6-4
2024-09-04vs MSA 7.5 (Mas Serve Aces)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Adcox / Ron Saunders vs Glory Questad / Shane Vaughan6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-08-28vs Hillcrest 7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMac Garrison / Dina Bostock vs Maria Heffner / Veeresh Gowdru Ramesh4-6, 1-6
2024-08-21vs Mix-n-MatchSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStuart Blackwell / Dina Bostock vs Peter Johansen / Suzanne Baran3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRon Saunders / Katheryn Burriesci vs Chadd Cripe / Kristen Boyd6-2, 6-3
2024-08-19vs NTF3SLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Burriesci / Dina Bostock vs Chris Gussner / Jean Nielsen0-6, 4-6
2024-08-14vs Tap Dat AceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Blackwell / Ron Saunders vs Steven Garcia / Robyn Roby4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEvelyn Elwer / Steve Elwer vs Erin Perry / John Chavez6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tenniscity10228823268
2Tap Dat Ace10227927311
3Domin-Asians93221434303
4WTF-202484251129276
5UP YOUR ALLY84201637309
6Hard Hitters75181841327
7NTF3S66181841324
8Mix-n-Match66201642362
9Loose Strings57171944312
10Hillcrest 7.548162042328
11Mister and Miss Hits39112556387
12MSA 7.5 (Mas Serve Aces)210122451358
13ETC Mixers#000000
14Between the Lines01203672431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
3.68
Scott Stewart
published 4
3.66
Gary Lim
published 4
3.61
Christine Elwer
published 4
3.59
3.57
Mary Burke
published 4
3.54
Caleb Roope
published 3.5
3.47
Mark Burriesci
published 3.5
3.40
Steve Elwer
published 3.5
3.38
David Lee
published 3.5
3.24
Stuart Blackwell
published 3.5
3.06
Mary Adcox
published 3.5
Dina Bostock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Evelyn Elwer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mac Garrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ron Saunders
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Burke + Caleb Roope17560% games+6.0% vs expected
Katheryn Burriesci + Mark Burriesci221952% games+5.1% vs expected
Christine Elwer + Steve Elwer272651% games−1.6% vs expected
Christine Elwer + Caleb Roope6951% games−3.0% vs expected
Mary Burke + Scott Stewart4553% games−6.1% vs expected
Steve Elwer + Evelyn Elwer10066% gamesnot enough data
Mary Adcox + Scott Stewart224 matchesnot enough data
Evelyn Elwer + Caleb Roope404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Blackwell
43W–21L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Scott Stewart
68W–66L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Gary Lim
83W–87L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Christine Elwer
156W–133L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Katheryn Burriesci
107W–95L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Mary Burke
151W–102L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Caleb Roope
110W–55L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Mark Burriesci
89W–53L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Steve Elwer
144W–104L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
David Lee
12W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Stuart Blackwell
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Mary Adcox
150W–194L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Dina Bostock
17W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Evelyn Elwer
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mac Garrison
11W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Ron Saunders
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.