Teams

Tap Dat Ace

2024 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 3.81 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tenniscity10228823268
2Tap Dat Ace10227927311
3Domin-Asians93221434303
4WTF-202484251129276
5UP YOUR ALLY84201637309
6Hard Hitters75181841327
7NTF3S66181841324
8Mix-n-Match66201642362
9Loose Strings57171944312
10Hillcrest 7.548162042328
11Mister and Miss Hits39112556387
12MSA 7.5 (Mas Serve Aces)210122451358
13ETC Mixers#000000
14Between the Lines01203672431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
John Perry
published 4
3.94
3.93
Brian Johnson
published 4
3.92
Jon Linzbach
published 4
3.91
Brian Naeve
published 4
3.80
Steven Garcia
published 4
3.80
Robyn Roby
published 4
3.73
Scott Anders
published 4
3.59
Linda Western
published 4
3.54
Jason Jones
published 4
3.48
Erin Perry
published 4
3.47
Stacey Walker
published 3.5
3.42
Hailey Smith
published 3.5
3.37
Dit Dudley
published 3.5
3.34
John Chavez
published 3.5
3.31
Leann Gilberg
published 3.5
3.30
Lori Ewing
published 3.5
3.26
Kiley Holt
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Roby + Steven Garcia14260% games+5.6% vs expected
Brian Johnson + Stacey Walker6160% games+4.5% vs expected
Erin Perry + John Perry51245% games−4.1% vs expected
John Chavez + Robyn Roby8067% gamesnot enough data
Dit Dudley + Robyn Roby4259% gamesnot enough data
Brian Johnson + Robyn Roby4165% gamesnot enough data
Brian Johnson + Anne Marie Carlisle4157% gamesnot enough data
Jason Jones + Robyn Roby3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
John Perry
186W–122L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Anne Marie Carlisle
51W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Brian Johnson
207W–115L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Jon Linzbach
113W–64L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Brian Naeve
53W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Steven Garcia
181W–115L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Robyn Roby
394W–188L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Scott Anders
96W–121L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Linda Western
103W–83L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Jason Jones
54W–64L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Erin Perry
68W–102L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Stacey Walker
72W–53L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Hailey Smith
88W–105L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Dit Dudley
159W–107L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
John Chavez
181W–102L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Leann Gilberg
124W–186L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Lori Ewing
92W–137L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Kiley Holt
43W–65L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.