Teams

X18 6.0 CV Carroll

2024 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Mixed

23 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-14vs X18 6.0 MV3 HerbuckLost 03
L#1 DoublesTim Hofer / Ivana Urbanowski vs Trip Herbruck / Elisa Meadows5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Seifried / Katie Seifried vs Ravi Krishnan / Shari Thompson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Parker / Nicole Parker vs Kern Jolibois / MEI LI7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-30vs X18 6.0 MV2 CarracherWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarl Parker / Monica Lozano vs Aimee Hannan / Aaron Fischer7-6, 6-2
2024-06-09vs X18 6.0 MV3 HerbuckLost 02
L#2 DoublesKatie Seifried / Mark Seifried vs Ravi Krishnan / Michelle Simko6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBob Halper / Anne Halper vs Kern Jolibois / MEI LI4-6, 1-6
2024-05-19vs X18 6.0 MV2 CarracherWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim Hofer / Mamie Manchester vs Vinit Makkar / Ritu Makkar6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Hofer / Chris Janson vs Nina Greenberg / Jerald Miluk6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDawn Kohn / Adam Kohn vs Richard Rozell / Sara Carracher2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X18 6.0 3 NC Snyder91201022218
2X18 6.0 MV3 Herbuck9124623254
3X18 6.0 3 LT2 Quist8223716185
4X18 6.0 2 CC Lombardo82201021206
5X18 6.0 PW Merugu64201025240
6X18 6.0 MV1 Anderson64171331264
7X18 6.0 2 LT1 Bissell55161433275
8X18 6.0 CV Carroll55131737297
9X18 6.0 2 TP Dean46151531252
10X18 6.0 3 GR Neely37102043308
11X18 6.0 2 PM Kalas28111942301
12X18 6.0 MV2 Carracher2892144303
13X18 6.0 MM Bode2872348317
14X18 6.0 3 AS Philippon1952552347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Kristin Hofer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Camden Spencer
published 3.5
3.04
Bob Halper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Tim Hofer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Ivana Urbanowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Carl Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
2.68
Chris Janson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Mamie Manchester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Betsey Poe
published 3
2.65
2.63
Dawn Kohn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Joseph Circelli
published
2.37
Monica Lozano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Jeffrey Spencer
published
1.96
Anne Halper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Adam Kohn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Carroll
published
Katie Seifried
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Seifried
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Carroll
published
Nicole Parker
published
Orlando Dangond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Halper + Bob Halper51244% games+5.1% vs expected
Monica Lozano + Orlando Dangond71240% games−12.6% vs expected
Mamie Manchester + Christian Manchester72341% games−13.7% vs expected
Mark Seifried + Katie Seifried11135% gamesnot enough data
Jill Carroll + Mike Carroll3550% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Kohn + Adam Kohn1538% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Hofer + Tim Hofer2352% gamesnot enough data
Tim Hofer + Ivana Urbanowski134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Hofer
110W–99L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Camden Spencer
42W–28L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Bob Halper
34W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.04
Tim Hofer
33W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Ivana Urbanowski
79W–73L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Carl Parker
67W–97L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Christian Manchester
31W–73L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Chris Janson
17W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Mamie Manchester
93W–93L career · 1 line in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Betsey Poe
46W–72L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Denise Derbyshire
78W–100L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Dawn Kohn
54W–74L career · 1 line in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.63
Joseph Circelli
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Monica Lozano
30W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.37
Jeffrey Spencer
15W–56L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.31
2.5
Anne Halper
24W–50L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Adam Kohn
7W–38L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jill Carroll
47W–35L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Seifried
11W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Seifried
10W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Carroll
7W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Parker
6W–24L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Orlando Dangond
16W–57L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.