Teams

X18 6.0 MV1 Anderson

2024 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Mixed

16 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-21vs X18 6.0 MV3 HerbuckWon 21
L#1 DoublesRichard Rezek / Gwen Anderson vs Karen Frederick / Trip Herbruck4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSara Nine / Jino Park vs Ravi Krishnan / Michelle Simko6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFelicia Norman / Chinmay Bhatt vs Kern Jolibois / Yasna Ottens6-2, 6-3
2024-06-30vs X18 6.0 PW MeruguWon 21
W#1 DoublesGwen Anderson / George Raguz vs John Keller / Nicole Drahuschak6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFelicia Norman / Jino Park vs Ashley Frazier / Tim Austin7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAbhinav Acharya / Mamta Wankhede vs Chris Free / Amy Free2-6, 4-6
2024-06-16vs X18 6.0 MV3 HerbuckLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexander Khaykin / Diane Leventhal vs Jack Gau / Yasna Ottens5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChinmay Bhatt / Haifeng Wang vs Jeeho Chang / Kate OHara2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFelicia Norman / Mike McManemy vs Kern Jolibois / Jennifer Grable7-6, 2-4
2024-06-09vs X18 6.0 MV2 CarracherLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeorge Raguz / Jennifer OKeefe vs Lauren Smith / Eric Smith4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGwen Anderson / Bin Zhao vs Nina Greenberg / Aaron Fischer6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMamta Wankhede / Abhinav Acharya vs Richard Rozell / Aimee Hannan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-06-08vs X18 6.0 MV2 CarracherWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Nine / Alexander Khaykin vs Kristin Chuko / Jerald Miluk6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHaifeng Wang / Mike McManemy vs Aimee Hannan / Richard Rozell6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGiovanna Ventre / Jino Park vs Sara Carracher / Alex Granovsky6-2, 6-4
2024-05-19vs X18 6.0 PW MeruguLost 03
L#1 DoublesJino Park / Sara Nine vs Kajal Herman / Peter Bitounis1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAbhinav Acharya / Mamta Wankhede vs Jessica Merugu / Tim Austin4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGiovanna Ventre / Bin Zhao vs Carmen Iditoiu / Srinivas Merugu4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X18 6.0 3 NC Snyder91201022218
2X18 6.0 MV3 Herbuck9124623254
3X18 6.0 3 LT2 Quist8223716185
4X18 6.0 2 CC Lombardo82201021206
5X18 6.0 PW Merugu64201025240
6X18 6.0 MV1 Anderson64171331264
7X18 6.0 2 LT1 Bissell55161433275
8X18 6.0 CV Carroll55131737297
9X18 6.0 2 TP Dean46151531252
10X18 6.0 3 GR Neely37102043308
11X18 6.0 2 PM Kalas28111942301
12X18 6.0 MV2 Carracher2892144303
13X18 6.0 MM Bode2872348317
14X18 6.0 3 AS Philippon1952552347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
George Raguz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Alexander Khaykin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Gwen Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Felicia Norman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Chinmay Bhatt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Bin Zhao
published 3
Diane Leventhal
published 3
2.65
Jino Park
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
David Mansfield
published 3
2.52
Sara Nine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Giovanna Ventre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Jennifer OKeefe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Abhinav Acharya
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Mamta Wankhede
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mike McManemy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Rezek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer OKeefe + George Raguz41043% games−6.8% vs expected
Abhinav Acharya + Mamta Wankhede033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
George Raguz
69W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Alexander Khaykin
59W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Gwen Anderson
91W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Felicia Norman
45W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Chinmay Bhatt
7W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Bin Zhao
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Diane Leventhal
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jino Park
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
David Mansfield
1W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
Sara Nine
36W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.52
2.5
Giovanna Ventre
48W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%75%25%
2.41
Jennifer OKeefe
38W–38L career · 1 line in 2024
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Abhinav Acharya
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mamta Wankhede
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike McManemy
8W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Rezek
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.