Teams

X18 6.0 3 LT2 Quist

2024 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-28vs X18 6.0 3 NC SnyderLost 12
W#1 DoublesStuart Jackson / Lissette Messick vs Douglas Snyder / Angie Adams3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrandon Walch / Nicole Peters vs Carl Blaine / Jen Zeiger4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Nutt / Elizabeth Meloy vs Ryan Brahler / Noelle Buso3-6, 2-6
2024-07-14vs X18 6.0 3 GR NeelyWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrandon Walch / Nicole Peters vs Ginger Neely / Brian Toth7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesClare Stacey / Dan Johnson vs Tammy Iams / John Ragner6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMegan Ha / Max Roszkowski vs Pam Miller / Jon Kellicker6-0, 6-1
2024-06-16vs X18 6.0 2 PM KalasWon 21
L#1 DoublesClare Stacey / Brandon Walch vs Christine Schwall / Bogdan Nicolae2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Quist / Valerie Quist vs Natasha Kalas / John Kalas6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Nutt / Elizabeth Meloy vs Jennifer Tople / Edward Tople6-0, 6-3
2024-06-09vs X18 6.0 3 NC SnyderLost 12
L#1 DoublesLissette Messick / Stuart Jackson vs Jacqueline Snyder / Jose Carlos Corona2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMegan Ha / Max Roszkowski vs Douglas Snyder / Jen Zeiger7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Quist / Valerie Quist vs Ryan Brahler / Karen Snyder6-0, 6-4
2024-05-19vs X18 6.0 3 GR NeelyWon 30
W#1 DoublesLissette Messick / Stuart Jackson vs Ginger Neely / Michael Curtis6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Ha / Max Roszkowski vs Val Belcher / John Ragner6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Meloy / Geoff Fiedler vs Kara Wedekamm / Brian Toth6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X18 6.0 3 NC Snyder91201022218
2X18 6.0 MV3 Herbuck9124623254
3X18 6.0 3 LT2 Quist8223716185
4X18 6.0 2 CC Lombardo82201021206
5X18 6.0 PW Merugu64201025240
6X18 6.0 MV1 Anderson64171331264
7X18 6.0 2 LT1 Bissell55161433275
8X18 6.0 CV Carroll55131737297
9X18 6.0 2 TP Dean46151531252
10X18 6.0 3 GR Neely37102043308
11X18 6.0 2 PM Kalas28111942301
12X18 6.0 MV2 Carracher2892144303
13X18 6.0 MM Bode2872348317
14X18 6.0 3 AS Philippon1952552347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Megan Ha
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Max Roszkowski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Geoff Fiedler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.03
Brandon Walch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Lissette Messick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Clare Stacey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Elizabeth Meloy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Timothy Adkins
published
2.52
Carolyn Kara
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Valerie Quist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
David Quist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Steve Nutt
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Stuart Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Quist + Valerie Quist26562% games+12.3% vs expected
Carolyn Kara + Brandon Walch10259% games−6.1% vs expected
Megan Ha + Max Roszkowski3449% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Kara + Steve Nutt2449% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Quist + Steve Nutt5162% gamesnot enough data
Geoff Fiedler + Elizabeth Meloy6070% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Meloy + Steve Nutt4161% gamesnot enough data
Brandon Walch + Clare Stacey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Ha
78W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Max Roszkowski
38W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.15
Geoff Fiedler
86W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Brandon Walch
46W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Lissette Messick
44W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Clare Stacey
62W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
Elizabeth Meloy
79W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.88
Timothy Adkins
28W–27L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Carolyn Kara
98W–70L career · 6 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
Valerie Quist
75W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
David Quist
70W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Nutt
77W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stuart Jackson
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.