Teams

MONTE VISTA HS 18MX6.0A

2023 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX6.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-17vs STONEBRAE 18MX6.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / KIM HOLLAND vs William Fung / Sophie de Saint Pierre6-4, 6-4
2023-01-29vs LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 18MX6.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / KIM HOLLAND vs Scott Yee / Linda Duchscherer6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-27vs CROW CANYON CC 18MX6.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Julia Gillette vs Romeda Arsanjani / Nick Barrow1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-01-20vs LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 18MX6.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Julia Gillette vs Robert Chuck / Olivia Mattox6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Kelly Sanchez
published
3.47
Julie Gundermann
published
3.45
Gurupreet Chabda
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Benjamin Cha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
KIM HOLLAND
published
3.29
Nilo Clava
published
3.17
Kristen Loughmiller
published
3.15
Julia Gillette
published
3.11
Gary Fries
published
3.05
2.95
Olga Keselman
published
2.92
2.91
Malou Matthew
published
2.86
Angela Shiu
published 3
2.85
Chandra Mundra
published 3
2.85
Traci Rebiejo
published
2.52
Elaine Marshall
published
Verena Zacharias
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Sanchez
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.57
Julie Gundermann
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Gurupreet Chabda
67W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Benjamin Cha
64W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
KIM HOLLAND
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Nilo Clava
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Kristen Loughmiller
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Julia Gillette
27W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.15
Gary Fries
28W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.11
Veronika Mora-Mieszkowski
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
Olga Keselman
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Cherie Charbonneau
11W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
Malou Matthew
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Angela Shiu
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Chandra Mundra
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.85
Traci Rebiejo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Verena Zacharias
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.