Teams

Southampton Lockhart

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-14vs Westwood AnthonyWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hardage vs Jordan Harper6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaurie Huizenga / Eileen Cerny vs Kristin Zach / Meghan Dexter6-1, 6-2
2023-06-09vs HCC Ross / BoydWon 10
W#1 SinglesKimberly Giancaspro vs Thu-Hang Groome6-1, 6-0
2023-06-07vs SCC AndrewsWon 10
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hardage vs Melissa Brunner-Brown6-0, 6-0
2023-06-02vs Raintree MartinLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaurie Huizenga / Kimberly Giancaspro vs Lisa Harmon / Kelly Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Lilia Dietz6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-31vs CCV WilliamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Bell / Lindsay Hardage vs Alexandra Huffman / Mary Beth Scott4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKimberly Giancaspro vs Megan Hodges5-7, 2-6
2023-05-26vs WOCC StringerLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Giancaspro / Susan Lockhart vs Betsy Kersey / Susan Mangin6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLindsay Hardage vs Liz Charles6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Huizenga / Denise Weisberg vs Anne-Marie Anderson / Erin Strunk6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-24vs SCC Nobles / ConsolvoWon 20
W#2 SinglesLindsay Hardage vs Carla Shaffer6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFaith Kallman / Linda Wood vs Sally Hurt / Heather Joyce6-2, 6-1
2023-05-19vs SCC CacciottiWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Lockhart / Laurie Huizenga vs Marianne Lane / Nancy Sullivan7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Karin Speizer6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesFaith Kallman vs Katherine Duncan2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lindsay Hardage
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.38
Eileen Cerny
published 3.5
3.35
Laurie Huizenga
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Denise Weisberg
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Deena Kretzer
published 3.5
3.26
Judy Napier
published
3.23
Kimberly Giancaspro
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Linda Larue
published
3.20
Rhysa South
published
3.17
Beth Stafford
published 3.5
3.16
Susan Lockhart
published
3.16
Linda Wood
published
3.06
Faith Kallman
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Maureen Sisti
published
Monte Shorte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhysa South + Susan Lockhart4254% gamesnot enough data
Judy Napier + Linda Larue123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lindsay Hardage
94W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Eileen Cerny
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Laurie Huizenga
96W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Denise Weisberg
175W–162L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Deena Kretzer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Judy Napier
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Kimberly Giancaspro
89W–101L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Linda Larue
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Rhysa South
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Beth Stafford
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Susan Lockhart
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Linda Wood
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Faith Kallman
205W–166L career · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Maureen Sisti
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
Monte Shorte
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.