FREMONT TC 18MX9.0A

2026 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule10 played

2026-03-15vs PLEASANTON 18MX9.0BLost 0–1

L#1 DoublesPatricia Birks / Scott Monismith vs Ellen Low / Keenaj Mahendra Mevada4-4

2026-03-04vs BAY TREES PK 18MX9.0ALost 0–2

L#2 DoublesAdlina Paramarta / Imran Allana vs Chiara Schwab / Nick Nguyen5-7, 4-6

L#3 DoublesCatherine Puzon / Scott Monismith vs Beth Workeneh / Benjamin Green0-6, 2-6

2026-03-02vs PLEASANTON 18MX9.0AWon 1–0

W#2 DoublesAmy Yang / Scott Monismith vs Dan Gullion / Marianne Dundon5-7, 6-0, 1-0

2026-02-28vs BAY TREES PK 18MX9.0ALost 1–2

L#1 DoublesStephanie Wei / Imran Allana vs Kyra Yee / Ryan Sablan4-6, 7-6, 0-1

L#2 DoublesGraciella Barco / Soham Mookerjea vs Chiara Schwab / Henny Huang2-6, 1-6

W#3 DoublesPatricia Birks / Scott Monismith vs Robin Zhou / Nick Nguyen6-3, 4-6, 1-0

2026-02-22Lost 0–2

L#2 DoublesChuong Truong / Nicole YEN vs Bryce Kristal / Dan Gullion5-7, 2-6

L#3 DoublesAlexander Liu / Stephanie Wei vs Mariia Gryukova / Steven Lehmer6-7, 2-6

2026-02-08Won 1–0

W#1 DoublesAmy Yang / Scott Monismith vs Tiffany Liew / Nathan Gong6-2, 4-6, 1-0

2026-02-07vs PLEASANTON 18MX9.0BWon 1–0

W#2 DoublesChuong Truong / Nicole YEN vs In Bum Kim / Teddy Handoko6-3, 6-1

2026-01-31Lost 0–1

L#3 DoublesSoham Mookerjea / Stephanie Wei vs Julia Porter / Thomas Lyhne5-7, 6-2, 0-1

2026-01-17vs PLEASANTON 18MX9.0BSplit 1–1

L#1 DoublesAmy Yang / Scott Monismith vs Taylor Long / Keenaj Mahendra Mevada3-6, 2-6

W#3 DoublesSerena Le / Chuong Truong vs Fion Cho / Teddy Handoko6-3, 6-2

2026-01-10vs BAY TREES PK 18MX9.0ALost 0–1

L#2 DoublesStephanie Wei / Edwin Pham vs Kyra Yee / Joshua Duong6-7, 3-6

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings27 teams · 18&Over MX9.0

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GOLDMAN TC 18MX9.0A	10	0	27	3	11	185
2RINCONADA PK 18MX9.0A	9	1	23	7	16	217
3SAN PABLO PK 18MX9.0A	9	1	24	6	19	193
4SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0B	9	1	22	8	21	214
5SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0C	8	2	24	6	18	225
6PLEASANTON 18MX9.0A	8	2	20	10	27	266
7SEASCAPE SC 18MX9.0A	8	2	21	9	28	251
8JOHNSON RANCH 18MX9.0A	7	3	18	12	26	258
9ALMADEN SR 18MX9.0A	7	3	18	12	31	293
10ST MARY 18MX9.0A	7	3	19	11	31	265
11SHELDON PK 18MX9.0A	6	4	20	10	25	237
12BAY TREES PK 18MX9.0A	6	4	18	12	27	232
13RIO DEL ORO 18MX9.0A	6	4	13	17	40	315
14FREMONT TC 18MX9.0A	4	6	13	17	38	296
15LOS GATOS SR 18MX9.0A	4	6	13	17	41	304
16BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 18MX9.0A	4	6	12	18	41	293
17SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0A	4	6	11	19	42	278
18MENLO ATHERTON HS 18MX9.0A	3	7	13	17	41	321
19CUESTA TC 18MX9.0A	3	7	9	21	43	307
20WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18MX9.0A	3	7	11	19	44	311
21OLYMPIC 18MX9.0A	2	5	6	15	31	202
22PLEASANTON 18MX9.0B	2	8	9	21	42	310
23BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18MX9.0A	1	9	8	22	45	304
24GOLD RIVER RC 18MX9.0A	1	9	9	21	47	321
25SAN PABLO PK 18MX9.0B	1	9	6	24	50	330
26MARIN TC 18MX9.0A	0	7	3	18	37	228
27PINEWOOD PK 18MX9.0A	0	10	6	24	51	328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45

Scott Monismith

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

4.44

Joshua Kaye

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

4.44

Serena Le

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published —

4.38

Imran Allana

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

4.35

Adlina Paramarta

usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 4.5

4.35

Soham Mookerjea

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

4.30

Edwin Pham

usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published —

4.28

Lisa Oktavia

usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published —

4.27

Nicole YEN

usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published —

4.22

Stephanie Wei

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

4.02

Graciella Barco

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

3.96

Patricia Birks

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

3.84

Amy Yang

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4

3.82

Chuong Truong

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.81

Tajoe Lun

usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

3.75

Catherine Puzon

usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.73

Bowyee Gong

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Kaye + Catherine Puzon	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Joshua Kaye + Amy Yang	2–1	3 matches	not enough data
Scott Monismith + Amy Yang	2–1	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Scott Monismith

14W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%65%35%

4.45

—

Joshua Kaye

16W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%65%34%

4.44

—

Serena Le

7W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026

no projection at this level

4.44

—

Imran Allana

17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%80%20%

4.38

4.5

Adlina Paramarta

39W–23L career · 13 lines in 2026

1%85%14%

4.35

—

Soham Mookerjea

14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026

1%85%14%

4.35

—

Edwin Pham

17W–8L career · 11 lines in 2026

2%91%8%

4.30

—

Lisa Oktavia

41W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026

2%92%6%

4.28

—

Nicole YEN

7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

4.27

—

Stephanie Wei

7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026

5%92%2%

4.22

—

Graciella Barco

10W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026

44%56%<1%

4.02

—

Patricia Birks

18W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026

<1%62%38%

3.96

Amy Yang

26W–12L career · 10 lines in 2026

1%87%12%

3.84

Chuong Truong

21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026

1%89%10%

3.82

—

Tajoe Lun

13W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026

91%9%<1%

3.81

Catherine Puzon

23W–19L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026

4%93%3%

3.75

Bowyee Gong

41W–25L career · 9 lines in 2026

5%92%3%

3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.