Teams

BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 18MX9.0A

2026 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-02-07Split 11
L#2 DoublesPhilipp Wehn / Katerina Novitskaya vs Erin Kim / Joseph Huang2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSilvana Gold / Brian Jacobsen vs Veeraya Pupatwibul / Michael Leopold7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2026-01-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJay Saddler / Renata Quintini vs Jiayi Shen / Jerry Liang2-6, 2-6
2026-01-24vs SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0CLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhilipp Wehn / Renata Quintini vs Nikhil Pandit / Jiayi Shen3-6, 1-6
2026-01-17vs PINEWOOD PK 18MX9.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Nicholson / Cameron Tehrani vs Manasa Gadde / Yang Gao6-3, 6-4
2026-01-11vs SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0BWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Nicholson / Cameron Tehrani vs Daniela Leal / Piyush Lakhawat6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings27 teams · 18&Over MX9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GOLDMAN TC 18MX9.0A10027311185
2RINCONADA PK 18MX9.0A9123716217
3SAN PABLO PK 18MX9.0A9124619193
4SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0B9122821214
5SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0C8224618225
6PLEASANTON 18MX9.0A82201027266
7SEASCAPE SC 18MX9.0A8221928251
8JOHNSON RANCH 18MX9.0A73181226258
9ALMADEN SR 18MX9.0A73181231293
10ST MARY 18MX9.0A73191131265
11SHELDON PK 18MX9.0A64201025237
12BAY TREES PK 18MX9.0A64181227232
13RIO DEL ORO 18MX9.0A64131740315
14FREMONT TC 18MX9.0A46131738296
15LOS GATOS SR 18MX9.0A46131741304
16BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 18MX9.0A46121841293
17SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0A46111942278
18MENLO ATHERTON HS 18MX9.0A37131741321
19CUESTA TC 18MX9.0A3792143307
20WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18MX9.0A37111944311
21OLYMPIC 18MX9.0A2561531202
22PLEASANTON 18MX9.0B2892142310
23BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18MX9.0A1982245304
24GOLD RIVER RC 18MX9.0A1992147321
25SAN PABLO PK 18MX9.0B1962450330
26MARIN TC 18MX9.0A0731837228
27PINEWOOD PK 18MX9.0A01062451328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cameron Tehrani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.64
Brian Jacobsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.41
Adeeti Ullal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
Sueyin Wong
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.35
Adlina Paramarta
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 4.5
4.32
Alex Zhou
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.31
Philipp Wehn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.29
Ranjit Narayanan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.24
Kevin Margo
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
4.16
Ranjit Deshpande
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
4.11
Jay Saddler
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
4.04
Jeannine Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.01
Lionel Yang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.94
Silvana Gold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.89
Shelly Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.85
Michelle Nicholson
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
3.57
Renata Quintini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Lily Huang
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Katerina Novitskaya
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lily Huang + Kevin Margo7654% games+27.0% vs expected
Brian Jacobsen + Silvana Gold134 matchesnot enough data
Lionel Yang + Michelle Nicholson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cameron Tehrani
2W–0L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Brian Jacobsen
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
4.5
Adeeti Ullal
14W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
4.41
Sueyin Wong
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
4.36
4.5
Adlina Paramarta
39W–23L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Alex Zhou
25W–6L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Philipp Wehn
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Ranjit Narayanan
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Kevin Margo
19W–19L career · 14 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
Ranjit Deshpande
10W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Jay Saddler
13W–21L career · 11 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
Jeannine Roberts
14W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.04
Lionel Yang
7W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Silvana Gold
45W–23L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Shelly Wallace
10W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.89
Michelle Nicholson
45W–22L career · 18 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.85
Renata Quintini
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Lily Huang
21W–14L career · 12 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.55
Katerina Novitskaya
8W–3L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.