Teams

MARIN TC 18MX9.0A

2026 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

27 players · average NTRP 4.43 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-11vs GOLDMAN TC 18MX9.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Borah-Schulist / Mark Schulist vs Karissa Watanabe / Nicholas Figueira1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Sohn / Jennifer Mills vs Lazar Vukoje / Mae Hoad4-6, 4-6
2026-02-27vs GOLDMAN TC 18MX9.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesCarnet Williams / Kimberly Borah-Schulist vs Sharan Shodhan / Katharine Dicconson0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Bianchi / David Erlich vs Mae Hoad / Henry Arndt7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-02-07vs GOLDMAN TC 18MX9.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Everest / Michael Damiani vs Justin Pau / Lizzie Siegle6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Borah-Schulist / Christopher Brawer vs Nicklas Chen Schmidt / Olivia Sun0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKushal Chakrabarty / Jennifer Mills vs Kevin Yeh / Amy Jiang3-6, 2-6
2026-02-03vs GOLDMAN TC 18MX9.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Morrell / Thomas Chang vs Karissa Watanabe / Clark Wininger2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames Brenner / Jennifer Mills vs Olivia Sun / Daniel Luo4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesChristine Costamagna / Christopher Brawer vs Lindsay Huang / Cody Lin3-6, 1-6
2026-01-18Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Morrell / Matthew Littrell vs Nicholas Figueira / Karissa Watanabe1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Borah-Schulist / Andrew Sohn vs Lazar Vukoje / Katharine Dicconson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYong Kim / Amy See vs Daniel Luo / Rina Matsumoto4-6, 0-6
2026-01-10vs OLYMPIC 18MX9.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Lefferts / Nicole Buckland vs Lance Ngo / Nicole Wedlake3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings27 teams · 18&Over MX9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GOLDMAN TC 18MX9.0A10027311185
2RINCONADA PK 18MX9.0A9123716217
3SAN PABLO PK 18MX9.0A9124619193
4SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0B9122821214
5SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0C8224618225
6PLEASANTON 18MX9.0A82201027266
7SEASCAPE SC 18MX9.0A8221928251
8JOHNSON RANCH 18MX9.0A73181226258
9ALMADEN SR 18MX9.0A73181231293
10ST MARY 18MX9.0A73191131265
11SHELDON PK 18MX9.0A64201025237
12BAY TREES PK 18MX9.0A64181227232
13RIO DEL ORO 18MX9.0A64131740315
14FREMONT TC 18MX9.0A46131738296
15LOS GATOS SR 18MX9.0A46131741304
16BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 18MX9.0A46121841293
17SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX9.0A46111942278
18MENLO ATHERTON HS 18MX9.0A37131741321
19CUESTA TC 18MX9.0A3792143307
20WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18MX9.0A37111944311
21OLYMPIC 18MX9.0A2561531202
22PLEASANTON 18MX9.0B2892142310
23BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18MX9.0A1982245304
24GOLD RIVER RC 18MX9.0A1992147321
25SAN PABLO PK 18MX9.0B1962450330
26MARIN TC 18MX9.0A0731837228
27PINEWOOD PK 18MX9.0A01062451328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 26 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Lisa Everest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.45
Michael Damiani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.43
Dana Marotto
published 4.5
4.38
Jennifer Mills
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.36
Kristin Morrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Kimberly Borah-Schulist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Christopher Brawer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Michael Myette
published
4.23
Christine Costamagna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
James Brenner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Nicole Buckland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
David Erlich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Andrew Sohn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Jonathan Lefferts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Kushal Chakrabarty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Amy See
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Nicole Bianchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Matthew Littrell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.88
Lisa Eastlack
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Michael Lustenberger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Carnet Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Robert Ahearn
published
3.68
Jason Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Kris Hinckley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Thomas Chang
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Susan Swezy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Schulist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Littrell + Lisa Eastlack123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Everest
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.88
Michael Damiani
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
Dana Marotto
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
4.43
Jennifer Mills
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
4.38
Kristin Morrell
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.36
Kimberly Borah-Schulist
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Christopher Brawer
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
Michael Myette
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Christine Costamagna
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
James Brenner
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Nicole Buckland
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
David Erlich
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Andrew Sohn
11W–15L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Jonathan Lefferts
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.07
Kushal Chakrabarty
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.97
4.5
Amy See
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
Nicole Bianchi
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.92
Matthew Littrell
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.88
Lisa Eastlack
39W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Michael Lustenberger
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Carnet Williams
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Robert Ahearn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Kris Hinckley
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
Thomas Chang
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
Susan Swezy
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Mark Schulist
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.