Teams

Gleneagles/Anderson-Steyn W7.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT W Monday · W7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-23vs McKinney/Mutter-Perales W7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Forret / Denise Whiddon vs Jeannette Keton / Kathy Battad3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandy Drexel / Brenda Whatley vs Terry Mutter / Justina Cox5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Erickson / Janis Stevens vs Anna Gortana / Jan Elwell1-6, 2-6
2026-02-16vs McKinney/Steglich W7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Forret / Denise Whiddon vs Danette Goodyear / Corrine Gregor5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobin L Steyn / Becki Novak vs Cindy Graham / Sandy Mayberry1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Anderson / Judy Newsom vs MaryLee VanHooker / Arlene Wiese6-1, 6-1
2026-02-09vs High Point/Walters W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Forret / Denise Whiddon vs Beverly Vucekovich / Patricia Thoma3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Newsom / Brenda Whatley vs Joanna Jackson / Barb O'Rear1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBecki Novak / Robin L Steyn vs Nancy Gibbs / Marla Howard2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-02-04vs High Point/Britson W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSilvia Kantor / Becki Novak vs Cathy Joseph / Anne Savino3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Newsom / Denise Whiddon vs Kelly Britson / Ruth Scribner4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Anderson / Elsa Burg vs Stephanie Bice / Debbie Buchanan3-6, 4-6
2026-02-02vs High Point/Master-Simpson W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSandy Drexel / LeAnn Priebe vs Carlin Mihm / Lisa Wierwille3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Newsom / Brenda Whatley vs Michele Gurley / Angela Dekinder0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesElsa Burg / Janis Stevens vs Margaret Bronsweig / Deedee Wise0-6, 3-6
2026-01-19vs RGAC/Lucas W7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesRobin L Steyn / Judy Newsom vs Laura Dufrene / SUSAN DEERE1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSandy Drexel / LeAnn Priebe vs SHELLEY ARKELL / Julie Asbill1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Erickson / Susan Forret vs Barbara Hanks / Chrissy Edwards4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-12vs Spring Park/Martinez-Lindsay W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBecki Novak / Silvia Kantor vs Aundi Henderson / Darby Jolly3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Whiddon / Robin L Steyn vs Debra Driscoll / MARY DAMKROGER2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElsa Burg / Julie Anderson vs Shannon Craig / Linda Braswell0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · W7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Spring Park/Martinez-Lindsay W7.06116511143
2High Point/Walters W7.06115614158
3High Point/Britson W7.04314719195
4RGAC/Lucas W7.04312923176
5High Point/Master-Simpson W7.034101122185
6McKinney/Steglich W7.034101125212
7Gleneagles/Anderson-Steyn W7.01641737238
8McKinney/Mutter-Perales W7.01631837239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Knepshield
published 3.5
3.12
Susan Forret
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Judy Newsom
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
LeAnn Priebe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Brenda Whatley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Robin L Steyn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Denise Whiddon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Janis Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Becki Novak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Elsa Burg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Fay Moraif
published
Lynn Erickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Drexel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Silvia Kantor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Whiddon + Susan Forret134 matchesnot enough data
Robin L Steyn + Judy Newsom033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Knepshield
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Forret
6W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
Judy Newsom
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
LeAnn Priebe
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3.5
Brenda Whatley
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Robin L Steyn
1W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Denise Whiddon
3W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Janis Stevens
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.69
3
Becki Novak
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Elsa Burg
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Fay Moraif
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Erickson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandy Drexel
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Silvia Kantor
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.