Teams

McKinney/Mutter-Perales W7.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT W Monday · W7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-23vs Gleneagles/Anderson-Steyn W7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesJeannette Keton / Kathy Battad vs Susan Forret / Denise Whiddon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerry Mutter / Justina Cox vs Sandy Drexel / Brenda Whatley7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Gortana / Jan Elwell vs Lynn Erickson / Janis Stevens6-1, 6-2
2026-02-16vs High Point/Master-Simpson W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Battad / Francoise Moyes Carnal vs Louise Master / Lisa Wierwille5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKirstin Perales / Debra Becker vs Angela Dekinder / Dina Patel0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Jaberi / Jeannette Keton vs Margaret Bronsweig / Deedee Wise3-6, 1-6
2026-02-12vs Spring Park/Martinez-Lindsay W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancoise Moyes Carnal / Kathy Battad vs Teri Wilson / Debra Driscoll2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Becker / Kirstin Perales vs Julie Bradley / Nancy Lacey3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Jaberi / Jeannette Keton vs Darby Jolly / Donna Steiss1-6, 1-6
2026-02-09vs High Point/Britson W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancoise Moyes Carnal / Justina Cox vs Cathy Joseph / Karin Lyons6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Gortana / Jan Elwell vs Susie Taub / Anne Savino2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnita Whitney / Debbie Klosky vs Michele Mandell / Judi Robeson1-6, 2-6
2026-02-02vs RGAC/Lucas W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancoise Moyes Carnal / Kathy Battad vs Tari Kinsey / Laura Dufrene3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Whitney / Jan Elwell vs Leslie Oelke / Mindy Lucas2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Klosky / Terry Mutter vs Hsiao-Lan Wilson / Barbara Hanks1-6, 1-6
2026-01-19vs High Point/Walters W7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFrancoise Moyes Carnal / Justina Cox vs Joanna Jackson / Laurin Shambora5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Whitney / Debbie Klosky vs Julie Altenau / Donna Bickerstaff2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAnna Gortana / Kirstin Perales vs Jackie Coburn / Marla Howard7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-12vs McKinney/Steglich W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancoise Moyes Carnal / Justina Cox vs Tammi Cole / Sandi Silverman3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDana Johnson / Terry Mutter vs Tamela Gough / Sherrie Worthington1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDebra Becker / Julie Jaberi vs Magan Flynn / Julie Hansen2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · W7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Spring Park/Martinez-Lindsay W7.06116511143
2High Point/Walters W7.06115614158
3High Point/Britson W7.04314719195
4RGAC/Lucas W7.04312923176
5High Point/Master-Simpson W7.034101122185
6McKinney/Steglich W7.034101125212
7Gleneagles/Anderson-Steyn W7.01641737238
8McKinney/Mutter-Perales W7.01631837239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cynthia Brugge
published 3.5
3.20
Francoise Moyes Carnal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Kirstin Perales
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Anna Gortana
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Anita Whitney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Debbie Klosky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jan Elwell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeannette Keton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Jaberi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Justina Cox
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Battad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Mutter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Battad + Francoise Moyes Carnal3543% gamesnot enough data
Jan Elwell + Anna Gortana224 matchesnot enough data
Francoise Moyes Carnal + Justina Cox033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Brugge
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Francoise Moyes Carnal
11W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Kirstin Perales
4W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Anna Gortana
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Anita Whitney
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Debbie Klosky
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jan Elwell
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeannette Keton
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Jaberi
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Justina Cox
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Battad
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Mutter
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.