Teams

Spring Park/Martinez-Lindsay W7.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT W Monday · W7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-23vs High Point/Master-Simpson W7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Bradley / Debra Driscoll vs Jennifer Deaton / Carlin Mihm7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLinda Braswell / Stacey Zartler vs Louise Master / Dina Patel4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMARY DAMKROGER / Donna Steiss vs Jennifer Williams / Renee Simpson7-5, 6-2
2026-02-16vs High Point/Britson W7.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAundi Henderson / Darby Jolly vs Ruth Scribner / Kelly Britson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Lacey / Judy Archbold vs Debbie Buchanan / Stephanie Bice2-6, 4-6
2026-02-12vs McKinney/Mutter-Perales W7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesTeri Wilson / Debra Driscoll vs Francoise Moyes Carnal / Kathy Battad6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Bradley / Nancy Lacey vs Debra Becker / Kirstin Perales6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDarby Jolly / Donna Steiss vs Julie Jaberi / Jeannette Keton6-1, 6-1
2026-02-09vs RGAC/Lucas W7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Bradley / Debra Driscoll vs SHELLEY ARKELL / Laura Dufrene6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Coates / Aundi Henderson vs SUSAN DEERE / Julie Asbill5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Braswell / Shannon Craig vs Chrissy Edwards / Hsiao-Lan Wilson6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-02vs High Point/Walters W7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Bradley / Debra Driscoll vs April Moeser / Laurin Shambora6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichelle Coates / Aundi Henderson vs Julie Altenau / Christie McFarland6-3, 6-4
2026-01-19vs McKinney/Steglich W7.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesDarby Jolly / Donna Steiss vs Judy Steglich / Sandi Silverman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStacey Zartler / Fran Zartler vs Sharon Smith / Arlene Wiese6-2, 6-3
2026-01-12vs Gleneagles/Anderson-Steyn W7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesAundi Henderson / Darby Jolly vs Becki Novak / Silvia Kantor6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDebra Driscoll / MARY DAMKROGER vs Denise Whiddon / Robin L Steyn6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShannon Craig / Linda Braswell vs Elsa Burg / Julie Anderson6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · W7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Spring Park/Martinez-Lindsay W7.06116511143
2High Point/Walters W7.06115614158
3High Point/Britson W7.04314719195
4RGAC/Lucas W7.04312923176
5High Point/Master-Simpson W7.034101122185
6McKinney/Steglich W7.034101125212
7Gleneagles/Anderson-Steyn W7.01641737238
8McKinney/Mutter-Perales W7.01631837239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Teri Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Shannon Craig
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.58
MARY DAMKROGER
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.53
Stacey Zartler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Debra Driscoll
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Aundi Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Donna Steiss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Darby Jolly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Fran Zartler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Judy Archbold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leanne Freiberg
published
Linda Braswell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Martinez
published
Nancy Lacey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Wilson + Stacey Zartler17368% games+5.9% vs expected
Debra Driscoll + MARY DAMKROGER5073% gamesnot enough data
Teri Wilson + MARY DAMKROGER303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Wilson
43W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.62
Shannon Craig
11W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
MARY DAMKROGER
40W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Stacey Zartler
26W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Debra Driscoll
68W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Aundi Henderson
32W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Donna Steiss
3W–2L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Darby Jolly
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Fran Zartler
22W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Judy Archbold
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Leanne Freiberg
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Braswell
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Martinez
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Lacey
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.