Teams

Lanc CC - Shelton

2024 USTA 18 & Over Mx Doubles League · 7.0 Mixed Doubles

24 players · average NTRP 3.55 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-04-13vs Hempfield - CampbellLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Been / Rob Castor vs Steve Campbell / Susan Wolf1-6, 1-6
2024-03-22vs RCW - Thomas / RamosWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebekah Landis / Joshua Landis vs Zach Manifold / Jen Weber5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Mann / Arthur Mann vs Jillian Newmoyer / Frank Wagner6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Fulton / Dave Groff vs Susan McCullough / Mark Gales6-2, 6-1
2024-03-17vs Hempfield - GRVTY (Bahn)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Garvin / Anne Nikolaus vs Luisito Honrade / Kathleen Schlager4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMark Harnish / Barbara Newman vs Vinh Liang / Angelle Jos San Jose6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHeather Shelton / Paul Newman vs Kim Wojciechowski / Michael Yan5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-03-02vs West Shore - EckhausLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Been / Robert Garvin vs Jurry Smith / Robert Lentz5-7, 2-6
2024-02-25vs West Shore - Mixed Nuts (Huff)Won 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Shelton / Mark Shelton vs Julie Himler / Robert Himler4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMikaela Leaman / Mark Harnish vs Carolyn Hopwood / Jonathan Stough6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Fulton / Paul Newman vs Timothy Shughart / Darlene Shughart6-2, 6-4
2024-02-23vs YACTA - KolmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Newman / John D Betteride vs Susan Kolmer / Rob Schwartz6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDave Groff / Anne Nikolaus vs Carolyn Cockey / Gregory Breton6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Beth Filling / Mark Shelton vs Lucy Kane / Joseph Kane Jr7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-16vs Hempfield - Hangen 7Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTroy Rider / Sarah Rider vs Josh Mann / Dorota Gasiorowski6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Harnish / Sarah Kline vs JoAnne Hangen / Darryl Wende2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJustina Juvonen-Dodge / ARTHUR DODGE vs Sue McDevitt / William Hershey Jr1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesSarah Kline / John D Betteride vs Laurie Lingenfelter / Sang Hyun Lim6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Shelton / Mark Shelton vs Bonnie Keating / Chris Pierce7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobert Garvin / Mary Beth Filling vs Jason Sperry / Bonnie Nolt6-1, 6-4
2024-02-02vs Wisehaven - BDELost 12
W#1 DoublesMikaela Leaman / Troy Rider vs Janet Krusen / Evan Robinson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Nikolaus / Dave Groff vs Alison Sabados / David Schneider6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Kline / Luis Toro vs Taylor Bury / Lance Fries3-6, 2-5
2024-01-12vs Hershey - CrespoLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Newman / John D Betteride vs Melanie Mathews / Andrew Tran1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Maurer / Paul Newman vs Lucinda McHugh / Michael McHugh3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBeth Been / Robert Garvin vs Sandra Crespo / Loc Tran6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Mikaela Leaman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.90
Sarah Rider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Barbara Newman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Arthur Mann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Heather Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Julie Fulton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Anne Nikolaus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Dave Groff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Mary Beth Filling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Rebekah Landis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Mark Harnish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
ARTHUR DODGE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Megan Maurer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Robert Garvin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Mark Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
John D Betteride
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Mary Mann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Rob Castor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Beth Been
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.28
Justina Juvonen-Dodge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joshua Landis
published
Luis Toro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Kline
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Troy Rider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justina Juvonen-Dodge + ARTHUR DODGE2442% games+1.2% vs expected
Mark Shelton + Heather Shelton51643% games−5.0% vs expected
Robert Garvin + Beth Been4842% games−6.4% vs expected
Arthur Mann + Mary Mann3353% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Newman + Rob Castor3353% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Newman + Mark Shelton044 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Newman + John D Betteride134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Shelton + Beth Been134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mikaela Leaman
100W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
Sarah Rider
74W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Barbara Newman
162W–157L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Arthur Mann
3W–3L career · type M · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Heather Shelton
148W–124L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
Julie Fulton
71W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Anne Nikolaus
16W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Dave Groff
22W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Mary Beth Filling
93W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
Rebekah Landis
76W–53L career · 1 line in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Mark Harnish
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
ARTHUR DODGE
3W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Megan Maurer
100W–90L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
Robert Garvin
20W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
Mark Shelton
60W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
John D Betteride
30W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
Mary Mann
39W–32L career · 1 line in 2024
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Rob Castor
18W–28L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Beth Been
71W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
Justina Juvonen-Dodge
25W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
0%96%4%
2.28
Joshua Landis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Luis Toro
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Kline
37W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Troy Rider
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.