Teams

USTA Atlanta/Pam Williams

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 55 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesRandi Nelson / Nancy Nash vs Kimberly Chastain / Sunny Hahn4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Gregory / Chris Dalrymple vs Renee Bullard / Patsy Kilmartin4-6, 7-5, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLori D'Adamio / Scottie Rittenberry vs Connie Bowns / Constance Aldredge6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMichelle Ashwood / Lori D'Adamio vs Barbara Pasko / Linda Ward6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChris Dalrymple / Linda Werren vs Judith Fulk / Mary Younie6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPam Williams / Randi Nelson vs Debra Lanham / Adrienne Marting5-7, 5-7
2025-10-30vs TPC Sugarloaf (Pat Parsons)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Ashwood / Lori D'Adamio vs Nora Doyle / Mala Migliore6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStewart Mary Jo / Nancy Nash vs Martha Barron / Cindy Powell7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesLori D'Adamio / Scottie Rittenberry vs Sunny Hahn / Aida Kelley6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Dalrymple / Linda Werren vs Brenda Duggan / Toni Pastoric6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesStewart Mary Jo / Nancy Nash vs Patsy Kilmartin / Kimberly Chastain5-7, 3-6
2025-10-08vs TPC Sugarloaf (Pat Parsons)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesLori D'Adamio / Michelle Ashwood vs Lynn Conrose / Ginger Ragsdale6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Gregory / Patty Bettencourt vs Mala Migliore / Laura Cegalis6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSherri Brown / Randi Nelson vs Martha Barron / Terry Bennett6-1, 1-6, 6-1
W#1 DoublesMichelle Ashwood / Lori D'Adamio vs Adrienne Marting / Jane Buturff6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatty Bettencourt / Michele Gregory vs Barbara Beirne / Judith Fulk6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStewart Mary Jo / Nancy Nash vs Debra Lanham / Susan Teel6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Georgian Resort (Teresa Greenwood)*601627122
2The Manor (Kim Barnes)*6014412129
3Buford City Park (Kimberly Chastain)*5112618184
4USTA Atlanta/Pam Williams4213513133
5Jefferson Township (Susan Rasumssen)*3361224194
6Village of Deaton Creek (Jane Buturff)*2461226201
7TPC Sugarloaf (Pat Parsons)*1551329224
8Terrell Mill (Sue Gilbert)*0631532216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Michelle Ashwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Patty Bettencourt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Chris Dalrymple
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Linda Werren
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Lori D'Adamio
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.95
Nancy Nash
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Scottie Rittenberry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Randi Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Stewart Mary Jo
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.83
Michele Gregory
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Sherri Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Bettencourt + Randi Nelson5073% games+19.9% vs expected
Scottie Rittenberry + Lori D'Adamio8072% games+18.2% vs expected
Patty Bettencourt + Nancy Nash7163% games+10.1% vs expected
Linda Werren + Michele Gregory17363% games+7.8% vs expected
Nancy Nash + Stewart Mary Jo8262% games+7.1% vs expected
Michelle Ashwood + Lori D'Adamio8361% games+6.5% vs expected
Nancy Nash + Michele Gregory4544% games+5.6% vs expected
Patty Bettencourt + Michele Gregory4163% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Ashwood
55W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Patty Bettencourt
55W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Chris Dalrymple
56W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Linda Werren
66W–72L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Lori D'Adamio
59W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Nancy Nash
68W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Scottie Rittenberry
33W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.93
Randi Nelson
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Stewart Mary Jo
38W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Michele Gregory
76W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Sherri Brown
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.