Teams

Jefferson Township (Susan Rasumssen)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 55 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-05vs Terrell Mill (Sue Gilbert)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesLinda McDaniel / Donna Schaaf vs Sue Gilbert / Maureen Griffin4-6, 6-2, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Hines / Deborah Shields vs Jennifer Venker / Dianne Eble6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Coskrey / Alice Bell vs Rosemary Candler / Pat Kaminski6-0, 7-5
2025-11-01vs Harrison (Karen Christian)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesDeborah Shields / Gina Vines-Clemans vs Elizabeth Hardin / Karen Martinez2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda McDaniel / Susan Rasmussen vs Karen Christian / Joyce Kime6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLuann Pierce / Lisa Whigham vs Lana Bailey / Barbara Gohlinghorst6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesAlice Bell / Gina Vines-Clemans vs Sue Stovall / Kristi Smith0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Hines / Luann Pierce vs Tammy Denney / Tammy Watts2-6, 2-6
2025-10-20vs Harrison (Karen Christian)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Schaaf / Susan Rasmussen vs Elizabeth Hardin / Jeanie Posey6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Martin / Linda McDaniel vs Susan Lindberg / Edie Cox3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLuann Pierce / Lisa Whigham vs Ann Woodward / Joyce Kime2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSusan Rasmussen / Deborah Shields vs Heidi Harris / Sue Stovall6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Hines / Mary Martin vs Tammy Denney / Ann Wood6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLuann Pierce / Lisa Whigham vs Cassandra Cleland / Teresa Greenwood4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-17vs Terrell Mill (Sue Gilbert)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesLinda McDaniel / Gina Vines-Clemans vs Sue Gilbert / Maureen Griffin6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDiane Hines / Susan Rasmussen vs June Salaun / Rosemary Candler6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLuann Pierce / Lisa Whigham vs Marilyn Kimball / Pat Kaminski6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Georgian Resort (Teresa Greenwood)*601627122
2The Manor (Kim Barnes)*6014412129
3Buford City Park (Kimberly Chastain)*5112618184
4USTA Atlanta/Pam Williams4213513133
5Jefferson Township (Susan Rasumssen)*3361224194
6Village of Deaton Creek (Jane Buturff)*2461226201
7TPC Sugarloaf (Pat Parsons)*1551329224
8Terrell Mill (Sue Gilbert)*0631532216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Linda McDaniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Lisa Whigham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Diane Hines
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Luann Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Alice Bell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Donna Schaaf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Barbara Coskrey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Deborah Shields
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Gina Vines-Clemans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Martin
published
Susan Rasmussen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda McDaniel + Susan Rasmussen51342% games+0.2% vs expected
Lisa Whigham + Luann Pierce4650% games−1.3% vs expected
Alice Bell + Diane Hines41039% games−3.8% vs expected
Diane Hines + Luann Pierce3837% games−6.3% vs expected
Diane Hines + Deborah Shields2530% games−8.3% vs expected
Linda McDaniel + Gina Vines-Clemans0740% games−8.8% vs expected
Diane Hines + Susan Rasmussen61643% games−12.7% vs expected
Diane Hines + Lisa Whigham1532% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda McDaniel
37W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
Lisa Whigham
22W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Diane Hines
36W–96L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Luann Pierce
12W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Alice Bell
23W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Donna Schaaf
16W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Barbara Coskrey
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Deborah Shields
7W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Gina Vines-Clemans
10W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Mary Martin
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Rasmussen
42W–84L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.