Teams

The Manor (Kim Barnes)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 55 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-05vs Fowler Park (Laura Dodd)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesPatrice Chishom / Jeanne Linkul vs Desiree Blake / Laura Dodd6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Kapp / Lisa Landau vs Jeramie Gibson / Karen Davis7-6, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJeanne Linkul / Patrice Chishom vs Denise Brew / Lucy Evans6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMali Hu / Wafaa Kanso vs Pamela Gross / Deborah Pantina6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Barnes / Lisa Landau vs Kathy Hunt / Lorraine Wais2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-22vs USTA Atlanta/Kim GillonWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatrice Chishom / Jeanne Linkul vs Kathleen Petro / Everely Lawrence6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMali Hu / Wafaa Kanso vs Barbara Gauthier / Anne Weathers6-3, 1-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmanda Kapp / Lisa Landau vs Kim Gillon / Wanda Grant6-2, 6-2
2025-10-15vs Fowler Park (Laura Dodd)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesPatrice Chishom / Jeanne Linkul vs Debbie Yancey / Kaye Stanzione6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGemma Verna / Stephanie Triplett vs Laura Dodd / Jane White6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMali Hu / Lisa Landau vs Patricia Martinez / Roxie Franks6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesPatrice Chishom / Tracy Warech vs Denise Brew / Lucy Evans4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMali Hu / Jeanne Linkul vs Kendall Collier / Kathy Hunt6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Landau / Stephanie Triplett vs Julia Connor / Lorraine Wais6-1, 7-5
2025-10-01vs USTA Atlanta/Kim GillonWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatrice Chishom / Jeanne Linkul vs Everely Lawrence / Lory Tuholski6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Landau / Amanda Kapp vs Wanda Grant / Nina Day6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKim Barnes / Tracy Warech vs Barbara Gauthier / Kathleen Petro2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Georgian Resort (Teresa Greenwood)*601627122
2The Manor (Kim Barnes)*6014412129
3Buford City Park (Kimberly Chastain)*5112618184
4USTA Atlanta/Pam Williams4213513133
5Jefferson Township (Susan Rasumssen)*3361224194
6Village of Deaton Creek (Jane Buturff)*2461226201
7TPC Sugarloaf (Pat Parsons)*1551329224
8Terrell Mill (Sue Gilbert)*0631532216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Cindy Werth
published 3
3.02
Jeanne Linkul
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.85
Patrice Chishom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Lisa Landau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Tracy Warech
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Mali Hu
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Wafaa Kanso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Amanda Kapp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Kim Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Gemma Verna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Angela Yu-Norris
published 3
2.45
Stephanie Triplett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Laetsch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Kapp + Lisa Landau6164% games+14.0% vs expected
Jeanne Linkul + Patrice Chishom12261% games+10.9% vs expected
Mali Hu + Lisa Landau13858% games+9.3% vs expected
Angela Yu-Norris + Patrice Chishom3348% games+6.8% vs expected
Jeanne Linkul + Stephanie Triplett5358% games+6.2% vs expected
Amanda Kapp + Tracy Warech5256% games+5.1% vs expected
Tracy Warech + Patrice Chishom2742% games−2.6% vs expected
Amanda Kapp + Angela Yu-Norris1440% games−10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Werth
28W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Jeanne Linkul
62W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Patrice Chishom
60W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.85
Lisa Landau
32W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Tracy Warech
29W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Mali Hu
60W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Wafaa Kanso
32W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Amanda Kapp
28W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Kim Barnes
26W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Gemma Verna
11W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Angela Yu-Norris
20W–47L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Stephanie Triplett
20W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
Mary Laetsch
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.