Teams

Team 6 Court Champs

2025 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-29vs Team 3 Dare DoublesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Shin / Benoit Kroely vs Lyn Reid / Paul Reid6-4, 6-1
2025-03-17vs Team 8 Causing a Racquet 6.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBenoit Kroely / Isabel Moore vs Ryan Kwon / Nicole Rosser3-6, 3-6
2025-03-11vs Team 1 Love & Learn TennisLost 01
L#2 DoublesIsabel Moore / Han Dong vs Alberto Zapata / JEANETTE SARAIVA2-6, 3-6
2025-03-02vs Team 4 CrenshawLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenoit Kroely / Isabel Moore vs Leslie Dumas / Joe Valdez0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-27vs Team 5 Love & Learn Tennis Team 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesIsabel Moore / Benoit Kroely vs Ilya Shapiro / Sophia Nguyen6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Benoit Kroely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Elizabeth Clarke
published
2.74
Cindy Brault
published 3
2.70
Julia Shin
published
2.66
Michelle Park
published
2.61
Ando Shin
published 3
2.56
Isabel Moore
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Qian Sheng
published
2.53
Donald Clarke
published
2.44
Kelsey Kosztowny
published
Christopher Walker
published 2.5
Jian Wen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benoit Kroely + Isabel Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Benoit Kroely
96W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Elizabeth Clarke
5W–22L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Cindy Brault
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Julia Shin
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Michelle Park
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.66
3
Ando Shin
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Isabel Moore
33W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Qian Sheng
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Donald Clarke
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Kelsey Kosztowny
6W–20L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.44
2.5
Christopher Walker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jian Wen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.