Teams

Team 4 Crenshaw

2025 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-03vs Team 7 EtheridgeLost 01
L#3 DoublesLeslie Dumas / Bryan Daguiar vs Kelly Depumpo / Robert Etheridge6-4, 1-5
2025-03-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesBryan Daguiar / Michele Brookhart vs Don Kim / Joyce Kim7-5, 3-3
2025-03-02vs Team 6 Court ChampsWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Damboise / Lisa Ohlweiler vs Qian Sheng / Keith Merritt6-0, 6-1
2025-02-23vs Team 1 Love & Learn TennisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Brandon / Kylie Gaskins vs Mark Jensen / JEANETTE SARAIVA4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnette Andersson / Bryan Daguiar vs Santiago Gasca / Alina Sharafutdinova6-0, 6-2
2025-02-12vs Team 2 YuLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoe Valdez / Michele Brookhart vs Xuan Du / Hongyangyang Shi1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBryan Daguiar / Lisa Ohlweiler vs Jie Wang / ZIJING YE3-6, 1-3
2025-01-26vs Team 7 EtheridgeWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Ohlweiler / Bryan Daguiar vs Claudia Ceballos / Ted Berner3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Ciel Park
published 3.5
3.23
Joe Valdez
published
3.03
Shane Haley
published
3.01
Ingook Park
published 3.5
3.01
Michael Brandon
published
2.98
Kylie Gaskins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Bryan Daguiar
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Lisa Ohlweiler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Anette Andersson
published 3
2.68
Michele Brookhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
2.49
Lemin Xiao
published
Leslie Dumas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Valdez + Ingook Park123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ciel Park
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Joe Valdez
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Shane Haley
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3.5
Ingook Park
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Michael Brandon
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Kylie Gaskins
140W–132L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Bryan Daguiar
60W–67L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Lisa Ohlweiler
31W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Anette Andersson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Michele Brookhart
27W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Christopher Damboise
5W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Lemin Xiao
16W–28L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Leslie Dumas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.