Teams

Team 1 Love & Learn Tennis

2025 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-01vs Team 6 Court ChampsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJEANETTE SARAIVA / Mark Jensen vs Elizabeth Clarke / Christopher Walker6-3, 6-3
2025-03-25vs Team 8 Causing a Racquet 6.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJEANETTE SARAIVA / Charles Penunia vs Ryan Kwon / Nicole Rosser0-6, 0-6
2025-03-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesMark Jensen / JEANETTE SARAIVA vs Alex Gallagher / Siavash Saadati6-2, 6-3
2025-03-11vs Team 6 Court ChampsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlberto Zapata / JEANETTE SARAIVA vs Isabel Moore / Han Dong6-2, 6-3
2025-03-01vs Team 5 Love & Learn Tennis Team 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohnathan Missner / JEANETTE SARAIVA vs Heidi Davis / Tuan Trinh6-2, 6-2
2025-02-23vs Team 4 CrenshawWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Jensen / JEANETTE SARAIVA vs Michael Brandon / Kylie Gaskins6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Adriana Lee
published 3
3.02
Mark Jensen
published
2.99
Johnathan Missner
published
2.89
Holly Wessmiller
published
2.88
2.87
JEANETTE SARAIVA
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Brian Wessmiller
published 3
2.69
Tracye Duffin
published
2.68
Charles Penunia
published 3
2.64
Alberto Zapata
published 3
Santiago Gasca
published
Tania Krissel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Wessmiller + Brian Wessmiller7168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adriana Lee
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Mark Jensen
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Johnathan Missner
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Holly Wessmiller
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Alina Sharafutdinova
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
JEANETTE SARAIVA
65W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Brian Wessmiller
7W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Tracye Duffin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Charles Penunia
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Alberto Zapata
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Santiago Gasca
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tania Krissel
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.