Teams

CVTA PURPLE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-05vs LTA-P BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Warriner / Payal Sathe vs Sarah White / Kirstin Santa Scholberg6-1, 6-1
2023-08-28vs RMTC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPayal Sathe / Heidi Warriner vs Roseanne Amoils / Susan Moran6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Michaela Masciarelli vs Cheri Belz / Carmel Gill7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2023-08-21vs BCC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Beard / Michaela Masciarelli vs Rachel Forward / Annah Worland6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Mckenna Jones vs Jackie Kramer / Beth Petersen3-6, 1-6
2023-08-14vs TTA-E BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Steed / Heidi Warriner vs Katie Brown / Vikki Hennard6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeghan Donahue / Michaela Masciarelli vs Janice Cook / Madison Fischer7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-09vs LTA-P BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerry Tessier / Mckenna Jones vs Kirstin Santa Scholberg / Kate Moin6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPayal Sathe vs Sarah White7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Beard / Michaela Masciarelli vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-07vs LTA-P REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Michelle Beard vs Gloria Andrews / Kristin Parsons2-6, 1-6
2023-07-24vs RMTC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeidi Warriner / Payal Sathe vs Pat Noyes / Kathy Blockwick6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Mckenna Jones vs Susan Moran / Sarah Estrella2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Heidi Warriner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Payal Sathe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.69
Michaela Masciarelli
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Terry Tessier
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Meghan Donahue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Tessier + Michaela Masciarelli2841% gamesnot enough data
Payal Sathe + Heidi Warriner6079% gamesnot enough data
Terry Tessier + Heidi Warriner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heidi Warriner
67W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
3.5
Payal Sathe
58W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
3
Michaela Masciarelli
31W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Terry Tessier
76W–108L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Meghan Donahue
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.