Teams

RMTC GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-04vs BCC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoseanne Amoils / Jasmine Okbinoglu vs Rachel Forward / Annah Worland2-6, 4-6
2023-08-28vs CVTA PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesRoseanne Amoils / Susan Moran vs Payal Sathe / Heidi Warriner1-6, 2-6
2023-08-21vs LTA-P REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesPat Noyes / Roseanne Amoils vs Kris Graham / Tanya Eisele6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJasmine Okbinoglu / Sarah Estrella vs Jennifer Arndt / Kristin Parsons2-6, 1-6
2023-08-14vs LTA-P BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Estrella / Susan Moran vs Alicia Hillen / Sarah White6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRoseanne Amoils vs Kate Moin2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-07vs TTA-E BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesPat Noyes / Roseanne Amoils vs Amy Butler / Casey Ahn-O'Connor6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTsugumi Richards / Cheri Belz vs Madison Fischer / Lindsay Madden6-7, 3-6
2023-07-31vs BCC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesPat Noyes / Roseanne Amoils vs Callie LoPresti / Annah Worland6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCheri Belz / Sarah Estrella vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-24vs CVTA PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesPat Noyes / Kathy Blockwick vs Heidi Warriner / Payal Sathe2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Moran / Sarah Estrella vs Terry Tessier / Mckenna Jones6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Sarah Estrella
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
Carmel Gill
published 3.5
3.38
Tsugumi Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Kathy Blockwick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Roseanne Amoils
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Cheri Belz
published 3
Pat Noyes
published
Susan Moran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roseanne Amoils + Tsugumi Richards2344% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Estrella
50W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Carmel Gill
31W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Tsugumi Richards
68W–62L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Kathy Blockwick
29W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Roseanne Amoils
23W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Cheri Belz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pat Noyes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Moran
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.