Teams

BCC NAVY

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-04vs RMTC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Forward / Annah Worland vs Roseanne Amoils / Jasmine Okbinoglu6-2, 6-4
2023-08-28vs TTA-E BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnah Worland / Katherine Honea vs Janice Cook / Casey Ahn-O'Connor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-21vs CVTA PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Forward / Annah Worland vs Michelle Beard / Michaela Masciarelli7-6, 6-2
2023-08-14vs LTA-P REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Forward / Beth Petersen vs Jennifer Arndt / Kris Graham2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-12vs TTA-E BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Kramer / Rachel Forward vs Lindsay Madden / Robin Longobricco6-4, 6-2
2023-07-31vs RMTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesCallie LoPresti / Annah Worland vs Pat Noyes / Roseanne Amoils4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Nora Astley
published 3.5
3.32
Annah Worland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Beth Petersen
published 3.5
3.23
Katherine Honea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Rachel Forward
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Shelly Edwards
published
Jackie Kramer
published
Marsha Vigil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Petersen + Rachel Forward7260% games+10.1% vs expected
Annah Worland + Rachel Forward8360% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Honea + Annah Worland2547% gamesnot enough data
Annah Worland + Nora Astley7068% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Honea + Rachel Forward123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nora Astley
67W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Annah Worland
55W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Beth Petersen
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Katherine Honea
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Rachel Forward
50W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Shelly Edwards
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.87
Jackie Kramer
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marsha Vigil
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.