Teams

Tennis Club of Hastings 65+ 6.0 W

2026 65&Over Women · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.70 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-19vs Hampshire 65+ 6.0 W - Vintage 65Won 21
W#1 DoublesElma Reingold / Catherine Mulhern vs Frances Magrino / Carol Richards6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Martin / Jennifer Ringstad vs JILL FISHER / June Ottinger3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Schubert / Carol Troy vs Tina Alper / Barbara Gallois4-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Elma Reingold vs Mary Bracken / Fiona Finnan5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ringstad / Donna Kalin vs Maura Walsh / Pamela Sorkin4-6, 0-6
2026-08-06vs Willowbrook Wildwomen 65+ 6.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ringstad / Donna Kalin vs Gita Kinney / Regina Allegretti-Davenport1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Schubert / Sheree Krigsman vs Patricia Robbins / Gladys DiSisto1-6, 0-6
2026-08-03vs CFB Allstars 65+ 6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Susan Rynn vs Deborah Berwa / Marianne Surre6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDiane Schubert / Donna Kalin vs Kathy Thorsberg / Beth Zolkind2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Troy / Karen Weidner vs Margo Stever / Joyce Patone3-6, 3-6
2026-07-20vs New York Athletic Club - 65+ 6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Donna Kalin vs Debra Urbinati / Mary Curto6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElma Reingold / Sheree Krigsman vs Maura Denigris / Angela Kapfhammer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Martin / Annie Merola vs Susan DeSoiza / Elise Hubsher3-6, 4-6
2026-07-13vs MBYC Tennis Armada 65+ 6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ringstad / Kathy Martin vs Lisa Nelson / Jill Robertson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Schubert / Carol Troy vs Miriam Leo / Joan Druker6-7, 2-5
L#3 DoublesSheree Krigsman / Karen Weidner vs Debbie Fuchs / Mary McLarnon3-6, 0-6
2026-06-18vs Hampshire 65+ 6.0 W - Vintage 65Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDonna Kalin / Jennifer Ringstad vs June Ottinger / Mary Kentros7-5, 4-5
L#2 DoublesJanice Shepps / Judith Hirsch vs Frances Magrino / Diane Couzens6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Martin / Diane Schubert vs JILL FISHER / SONOKO LEOPOLD5-7, 2-6
2026-06-08vs Gillie Grandes Dames - 65+ 6.0 WWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Janice Shepps vs Rita Raz / Jeanne Pollock6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Ringstad / Kathy Martin vs Megan Dempsey / Nancy Simon6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Schubert / Sheree Krigsman vs Ellin Greenstein / Shirley Shwiel0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Catherine Mulhern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Janice Shepps
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.27
Judith Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Annie Merola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Carol Troy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.03
Diane Schubert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Donna Kalin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Elma Reingold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Ringstad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Weidner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Martin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sheree Krigsman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Rynn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Hirsch + Catherine Mulhern5250% games+1.3% vs expected
Janice Shepps + Catherine Mulhern201351% games−3.0% vs expected
Donna Kalin + Jennifer Ringstad4549% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Ringstad + Catherine Mulhern3644% gamesnot enough data
Diane Schubert + Kathy Martin2544% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Martin + Catherine Mulhern3449% gamesnot enough data
Carol Troy + Judith Hirsch3449% gamesnot enough data
Elma Reingold + Catherine Mulhern5255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Catherine Mulhern
65W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Janice Shepps
43W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Judith Hirsch
13W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.27
2.5
Annie Merola
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Carol Troy
7W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Diane Schubert
5W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Donna Kalin
41W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Elma Reingold
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Ringstad
22W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Weidner
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Martin
21W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheree Krigsman
7W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Rynn
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.