Teams

Gillie Grandes Dames - 65+ 6.0 W

2026 65&Over Women · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-17vs New York Athletic Club - 65+ 6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Aranow / Linda Borenstein vs Mary Curto / Debra Urbinati6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-12vs Hampshire 65+ 6.0 W - Vintage 65Won 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Kasarsky / Linda Borenstein vs June Ottinger / Frances Magrino6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Cunningham / Ellin Greenstein vs Barbara Gallois / Carin Gendell6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Aranow / Roberta Kirshbaum vs Judy Robinson / Tina Alper6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesLinda Borenstein / Susan Kasarsky vs Addie Havemeyer / Fiona Finnan7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRita Raz / Nancy Simon vs Tina Palmieri / Dottie Poppas2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Cunningham / Jeanne Pollock vs Mary Bracken / Elke Betley6-0, 7-6
2026-07-22vs Willowbrook Wildwomen 65+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Tuller / Diana Cunningham vs Allyson Davidov / Gita Kinney2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEllin Greenstein / Shirley Shwiel vs Doreen Engelsher / Cathleen Newsham5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Rita Raz vs Patricia Robbins / Ethel Wagner1-6, 6-7
2026-07-13vs CFB Allstars 65+ 6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Borenstein / Diana Cunningham vs Laura Buck / Marianne Surre4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Kasarsky / Rita Raz vs Cathy Cuozzo / Joyce Patone7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeanne Pollock / Roberta Kirshbaum vs Shang Guo / Reyna Gonzalez0-6, 1-6
2026-07-08vs MBYC Tennis Armada 65+ 6.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Borenstein / Diana Cunningham vs Debbie Fuchs / Debra Green6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEllin Greenstein / Nancy Simon vs Miriam Leo / Jill Robertson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Rita Raz vs Linda Kalos / Valerie Skolnick6-1, 6-0
2026-06-25vs Willowbrook Wildwomen 65+ 6.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Borenstein / Shirley Shwiel vs Regina Allegretti-Davenport / Allyson Davidov1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNancy Simon / Susan Kasarsky vs Patricia Robbins / Doreen Engelsher3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoberta Kirshbaum / Nancy Aranow vs Silvia Stern / Michele Kraushaar3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-08vs Tennis Club of Hastings 65+ 6.0 WLost 12
L#1 DoublesRita Raz / Jeanne Pollock vs Catherine Mulhern / Janice Shepps3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Nancy Simon vs Jennifer Ringstad / Kathy Martin1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEllin Greenstein / Shirley Shwiel vs Diane Schubert / Sheree Krigsman6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Diana Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.96
Lisa Kiernan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Nancy Aranow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Amy Tuller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Ellin Greenstein
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jeanne Pollock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Borenstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lorraine Kapilow
published
Megan Dempsey
published
Nancy Simon
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Rita Raz
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Roberta Kirshbaum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shirley Shwiel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Kasarsky
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Borenstein + Rita Raz161553% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Simon + Megan Dempsey11450% gamesnot enough data
Shirley Shwiel + Linda Borenstein4548% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Aranow + Rita Raz134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Tuller + Diana Cunningham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diana Cunningham
39W–42L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Lisa Kiernan
54W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Nancy Aranow
66W–138L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Amy Tuller
36W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.56
2.5
Ellin Greenstein
8W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
Jeanne Pollock
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Borenstein
34W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lorraine Kapilow
13W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Dempsey
27W–32L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Simon
25W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rita Raz
38W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roberta Kirshbaum
23W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shirley Shwiel
19W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Kasarsky
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.