Teams

MBYC Tennis Armada 65+ 6.0W

2026 65&Over Women · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-24vs New York Athletic Club - 65+ 6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMiriam Leo / Debbie Fuchs vs Mary Curto / Debra Urbinati6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMary McLarnon / Joan Druker vs Carol Pezone / Eileen ORourke7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesValerie Skolnick / Linda Kalos vs Susan Belardino / Diane Lock3-6, 0-6
2026-08-13vs Willowbrook Wildwomen 65+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoan Druker / Miriam Leo vs Gita Kinney / Regina Allegretti-Davenport1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Fuchs / Mary McLarnon vs Michele Kraushaar / Cathleen Newsham2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Kalos / Debra Green vs Silvia Stern / Teresa Duguet3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesMartha Kaufman / Jill Robertson vs Laurie Anderson / Fiona Finnan3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary McLarnon / Susan Abramowitz vs Elke Betley / Mary Bracken0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Doud / Debra Green vs Susan Halper / Nancy Hanover3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-04vs Hampshire 65+ 6.0 W - Vintage 65Won 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Halen / Jill Robertson vs June Ottinger / Linda Riefberg1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMiriam Leo / Joan Druker vs Barbara Gallois / Carin Gendell6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDebbie Fuchs / Mary McLarnon vs Judy Robinson / SONOKO LEOPOLD6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Halen / Martha Kaufman vs Laura Kaplan / Maura Walsh2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary McLarnon / Miriam Leo vs Elke Betley / Mary Bracken1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Green / Valerie Skolnick vs Diana Daneshvar / Karen Villamena0-6, 0-6
2026-07-13vs Tennis Club of Hastings 65+ 6.0 WWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Nelson / Jill Robertson vs Jennifer Ringstad / Kathy Martin2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMiriam Leo / Joan Druker vs Diane Schubert / Carol Troy7-6, 5-2
W#3 DoublesDebbie Fuchs / Mary McLarnon vs Sheree Krigsman / Karen Weidner6-3, 6-0
2026-07-08vs Gillie Grandes Dames - 65+ 6.0 WLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Fuchs / Debra Green vs Linda Borenstein / Diana Cunningham1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMiriam Leo / Jill Robertson vs Ellin Greenstein / Nancy Simon2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Kalos / Valerie Skolnick vs Megan Dempsey / Rita Raz1-6, 0-6
2026-06-29vs CFB Allstars 65+ 6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMiriam Leo / Debbie Fuchs vs Jackie DeVittorio / Beth Zolkind1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Kalos / Mary McLarnon vs Thuy Tran-Quinn / Reyna Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Zimmerman / Susan Abramowitz vs Katrena McGill / Kathleen Fernald2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Debbie Fuchs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.39
Miriam Leo
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.12
Debra Green
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.11
Mary McLarnon
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.09
Elizabeth Halen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.82
Valerie Skolnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ellen Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Joan Druker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Kalos
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Martha Kaufman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Abramowitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Doud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miriam Leo + Joan Druker2344% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Halen + Joan Druker123 matchesnot enough data
Mary McLarnon + Debbie Fuchs213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Kalos + Joan Druker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debbie Fuchs
3W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.53
Miriam Leo
3W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Debra Green
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Mary McLarnon
40W–93L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Elizabeth Halen
18W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Valerie Skolnick
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Ellen Zimmerman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jill Robertson
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joan Druker
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Kalos
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Kaufman
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Abramowitz
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Doud
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.