Teams

BP GREEN

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesMadison Fortunato / Alexandra Wingert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-13vs LTA-P PURPLEWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMadison Fortunato / Alexandra Wingert vs Halonah Paiss / Tara Tovar6-1, 6-0
2025-07-08vs NJ TEALLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAlexis Klas / Ali Wissink vs SARA SCHERFF / Macy Bauerle1-6, 2-4
2025-07-01vs KC-RH REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAlexis Klas / Madison Fortunato vs Laura Kane / Anitra Sopronyi6-2, 7-5
2025-06-17vs NJ NAVYLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAli Wissink / Lisa McGehee vs Casey Rhine / Lucy McMurry1-6, 3-6
2025-06-16vs NJ TEALWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesAlexandra Wingert vs Callie Hennessy6-1, 6-1
W#2 Female SinglesMadison Fortunato vs Paige Orgel6-1, 6-1
2025-06-10vs PRKR YELLOWWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAlexis Klas / Ali Wissink vs Cassandra Buckner / Taryn Smallwood0-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CHCC RED7017412136
2GAC GOLD60153794
3WP NAVY5214715142
4TTA BLUE4210820176
5GR PURPLE3371122186
6MC TEAL2481021159
7BP GREEN2471123172
8LEBTC BLUE2481024187
9CP WHITE25101125199
10SKY NAVY2541736234
11SS-H ORANGE1561226181
12BP NAVY1661531207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Sophie Dimoff
published
4.04
Alexis Klas
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Masha Carey
published
3.81
Alexandra Wingert
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 4
3.81
Madison Fortunato
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 4
3.71
Ali Wissink
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Lisa McGehee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Wingert + Madison Fortunato7264% games+6.4% vs expected
Masha Carey + Ali Wissink3259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophie Dimoff
71W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Alexis Klas
70W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
Masha Carey
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Alexandra Wingert
69W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Madison Fortunato
38W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Ali Wissink
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Lisa McGehee
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.