Teams

NJ NAVY

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15vs LTA-P PURPLEWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesErica Moser / Katherine Lazenby vs Olimpia Mejia / Tara Tovar6-3, 6-1
W#2 Female SinglesCasey Rhine vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-10vs NJ TEALWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesLisa Christman / Lucy McMurry vs Caitlin Bock / SARA SCHERFF4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-08vs KC-RH REDWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesLucy McMurry vs Anitra Sopronyi6-2, 6-2
2025-07-01vs PRKR YELLOWWon 10
W#2 Female SinglesLucy McMurry vs Taryn Smallwood3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-19Lost 01
L#2 Female SinglesCasey Rhine vs Laura Kane6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-17vs BP GREENWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesCasey Rhine / Lucy McMurry vs Ali Wissink / Lisa McGehee6-1, 6-3
2025-06-10vs LTA-P PURPLELost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCasey Rhine / Sally Swiatek vs Tara Tovar / Amita Pandey1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KNO NAVY601715100
2CACM PINK6014411109
3NJ NAVY5111717158
4VCC TEAL4211717144
5HV YELLOW4210818140
6CHCC YELLOW339918155
7KC-RH YELLOW3371123172
8SS-G ORANGE2471125191
9DTP GREEN1561225176
10DTC GREEN1561225172
11HRCA-N TEAL1561226173
12SS-D TEAL1551329195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
4.05
Lucy McMurry
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 4
3.97
Erica Moser
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Lisa Christman
published
3.56
Casey Rhine
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Singles 50% · published 4
3.32
Adrienne Tosto
published 3.5
Jamie Pledger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Rhine + Lucy McMurry4453% games−0.8% vs expected
Erica Moser + Katherine Lazenby3255% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Christman + Lucy McMurry303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katherine Lazenby
80W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
4.23
4
Lucy McMurry
33W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
Erica Moser
33W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Lisa Christman
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.73
4
Casey Rhine
31W–80L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Adrienne Tosto
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Jamie Pledger
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.