Teams

PRKR YELLOW

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15vs BP GREENLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesChelsea Ponciano vs Sophie Dimoff4-6, 1-6
2025-07-08vs LTA-P PURPLELost 01
L#1 Female SinglesChelsea Ponciano vs Ronnie Meyers3-6, 3-6
2025-07-01vs NJ NAVYLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesHalia Pena / Chelsea Sump vs Jamie Pledger / Katherine Lazenby0-6, 4-6
L#2 Female SinglesTaryn Smallwood vs Lucy McMurry6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-24vs KC-RH REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesReana Kaminsky / Taryn Smallwood vs Ava Katubig / Sarah Schoeffel6-2, 6-3
2025-06-17vs NJ TEALWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesCassandra Buckner / Victoria Keller vs SARA SCHERFF / Callie Hennessy6-4, 6-3
W#1 Female SinglesChelsea Ponciano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-10vs BP GREENLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCassandra Buckner / Taryn Smallwood vs Alexis Klas / Ali Wissink6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-03vs LTA-P PURPLELost 01
L#1 Female DoublesReana Kaminsky / Chelsea Sump vs Amita Pandey / Olimpia Mejia2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KC-RH RED34111024178
2PRKR YELLOW34101124181
3LTA-P PURPLE1671430200
4NJ TEAL1641736234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Taryn Smallwood
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 4
Annie Ross
published 4
3.74
Jenny Jessup
published
3.71
Reana Kaminsky
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Chelsea Sump
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Chelsea Ponciano
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 4
3.32
Cassandra Buckner
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Halia Pena
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taryn Smallwood + Reana Kaminsky303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Taryn Smallwood
109W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Annie Ross
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Jessup
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Reana Kaminsky
89W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Chelsea Sump
34W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Chelsea Ponciano
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Cassandra Buckner
89W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Halia Pena
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.