Teams

Moss Caliente

2024 TRI-Level · Caliente 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-04vs PHX/Schreiber/TRIWOMEN/4.0/3.5/3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChien Hue Edwards / Kelly Urlocker vs Christina Harrison / Stephanie Verderame5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Nguyen / Trinh Tran vs Lisa Schreiber / Heidi Hoffer2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Peppo / Gretchen Bunker vs Nicole Heath / Nicole Rosales1-6, 5-7
2024-05-04vs Spider Monkeys CalienteLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherrie Rook / Stacie White vs Amber Bersi / Brandi Okrasinski4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Moss / Ann Kalhorn vs Jami Gamez / Carol Bellemare4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSherri Nichols / Phu-My Gep vs Lucia Lipari / Aimee Hombach4-6, 1-6
2024-05-03vs Morris CalienteLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Urlocker / Chien Hue Edwards vs Aditi Jhalani / Nicole Harmon3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlyssa Moss / Leah Nguyen vs Jeanne LoTempio / Elizabeth Hargrove7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGretchen Bunker / Sherri Nichols vs Joy Benson / Kristy Morris7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-03vs Jaquess CalienteLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacie White / Sherrie Rook vs Kristy Miller / Holly Wohler1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWendee Gabel / Trinh Tran vs Kristi Kiernan / Shannon Gleave4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Peppo / Phu-My Gep vs Lorna Jaquess / Courtney Skvarla2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · Caliente 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jaquess Caliente40111477
2Spider Monkeys Caliente4093797
3Smasheronies Caliente3193884
4PHX/Schreiber/TRIWOMEN/4.0/3.5/3.03193885
5Morris Caliente225716114
6Chiariello Caliente224818129
7TakoTaylor Caliente136613101
8Line Judge Judies Caliente134818119
9HotShots Caliente0421021132
10Moss Caliente0411122142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Sherrie Rook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Leah Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Chien Hue Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Alyssa Moss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Wendee Gabel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Sherri Nichols
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Phu-My Gep
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Deborah Peppo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gretchen Bunker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ann Kalhorn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Urlocker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Hall
published
Stacie White
published
Trinh Tran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chien Hue Edwards + Kelly Urlocker134 matchesnot enough data
Alyssa Moss + Leah Nguyen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherrie Rook
107W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
Leah Nguyen
21W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Chien Hue Edwards
56W–82L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Alyssa Moss
138W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Wendee Gabel
25W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Sherri Nichols
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Phu-My Gep
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Deborah Peppo
18W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Gretchen Bunker
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ann Kalhorn
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Urlocker
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Hall
31W–37L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacie White
38W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trinh Tran
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.