Teams

Chiariello Caliente

2024 TRI-Level · Caliente 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-04vs Line Judge Judies CalienteWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Youngdahl / Jade LeWin vs Ann Wagner / Laura Slawny6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesApril Halaby / Jane Herthel vs Deana Perrin / Tonya Rowell1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Haley / Hilda Tuel vs Laura Pierce / Anne Burns1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-04vs Morris CalienteWon 21
W#1 DoublesQuita Remick / Michelle Atteberry vs Dana Jones / Nicole Harmon6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoAnne Chiariello / April Halaby vs Sarah Kindler / Deanna Scott0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Fonte / Hilda Tuel vs Ginger Palmer / Janet Wells6-4, 6-3
2024-05-04vs Jaquess CalienteLost 03
L#1 DoublesApril Halaby / Rose Chakkoria vs Kristy Miller / Sherri Finnegan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoAnne Chiariello / Jane Herthel vs Laura Rockowitz / Shannon Gleave2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Haley / Allison Fonte vs Courtney Skvarla / Jessica Cameron3-6, 4-6
2024-05-03vs Smasheronies CalienteLost 03
L#1 DoublesJosephine Bidwill / Quita Remick vs Tracey Gran / Hannah Thornsburg1-6, 1-5
L#2 DoublesJoAnne Chiariello / Rose Chakkoria vs Shelli Barcello / Anne Parsons3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Fonte / Hilda Tuel vs Sarah Schultz / Cheryl Sharpe0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · Caliente 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jaquess Caliente40111477
2Spider Monkeys Caliente4093797
3Smasheronies Caliente3193884
4PHX/Schreiber/TRIWOMEN/4.0/3.5/3.03193885
5Morris Caliente225716114
6Chiariello Caliente224818129
7TakoTaylor Caliente136613101
8Line Judge Judies Caliente134818119
9HotShots Caliente0421021132
10Moss Caliente0411122142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Michelle Atteberry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Lori Youngdahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Jade LeWin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Rose Chakkoria
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
April Halaby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Holland Cohen
published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Haley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
JoAnne Chiariello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Allison Fonte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Hilda Tuel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Susan Hamman
published
Jane Herthel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Josephine Bidwill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Quita Remick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Atteberry
150W–61L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.99
Lori Youngdahl
94W–66L career · 1 line in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Jade LeWin
109W–198L career · 1 line in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.42
Rose Chakkoria
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
April Halaby
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Holland Cohen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Katherine Haley
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.98
JoAnne Chiariello
7W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Allison Fonte
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Hilda Tuel
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Hamman
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.70
Jane Herthel
7W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Josephine Bidwill
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Quita Remick
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.