Teams

Smasheronies Caliente

2024 TRI-Level · Caliente 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-04vs Line Judge Judies CalienteWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristi Walker / Hannah Thornsburg vs Sunny Resch / Kathy Dutridge6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Parsons / Shelli Barcello vs Tevia Wall / Denise Hamon6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAngela Abbott / Sarah Schultz vs Laura Pierce / Anne Burns2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-04vs Morris CalienteWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatasha Huzevka / Kristi Walker vs Aditi Jhalani / Melissa Ronneseth2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJenie Kemp-Magen / Sarah Farrell vs Jeanne LoTempio / Elizabeth Hargrove6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAngela Abbott / Cheryl Sharpe vs Kristy Morris / Joy Benson7-5, 6-1
2024-05-04vs Spider Monkeys CalienteLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracey Gran / Natasha Huzevka vs Amber Bersi / Jacqueline Brauneis4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Farrell / Jenie Kemp-Magen vs Jami Gamez / Monica Maldonado Cruz5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Abbott / Cheryl Sharpe vs Lydia Romero / Heather Cwynar6-2, 7-5
2024-05-03vs Chiariello CalienteWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracey Gran / Hannah Thornsburg vs Josephine Bidwill / Quita Remick6-1, 5-1
W#2 DoublesShelli Barcello / Anne Parsons vs JoAnne Chiariello / Rose Chakkoria6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Schultz / Cheryl Sharpe vs Allison Fonte / Hilda Tuel6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · Caliente 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jaquess Caliente40111477
2Spider Monkeys Caliente4093797
3Smasheronies Caliente3193884
4PHX/Schreiber/TRIWOMEN/4.0/3.5/3.03193885
5Morris Caliente225716114
6Chiariello Caliente224818129
7TakoTaylor Caliente136613101
8Line Judge Judies Caliente134818119
9HotShots Caliente0421021132
10Moss Caliente0411122142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Hannah Thornsburg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Natasha Huzevka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Tracey Gran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Kristi Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Sarah Farrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Anne Parsons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Angela Abbott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Jenie Kemp-Magen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Cheryl Sharpe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sarah Schultz
published
Shelli Barcello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelli Barcello + Anne Parsons3346% gamesnot enough data
Natasha Huzevka + Kristi Walker213 matchesnot enough data
Natasha Huzevka + Hannah Thornsburg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Thornsburg
71W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.02
Natasha Huzevka
103W–87L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
Tracey Gran
55W–82L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Kristi Walker
50W–90L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Sarah Farrell
32W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Anne Parsons
25W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Angela Abbott
22W–33L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jenie Kemp-Magen
55W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Cheryl Sharpe
109W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Sarah Schultz
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelli Barcello
25W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.