Teams

*1-KFuller-Eno

2024 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-31vs *4-EWyngaarden-HRWon 10
W#1 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Carrie Couto6-4, 6-4
2024-07-15vs *3-PostRust/McGill-DFCWon 10
W#1 SinglesNancy Pack vs Dayna Kelly6-3, 7-5
2024-07-08vs *2-JPerry-CHTCLost 01
L#3 SinglesPamela Hankerson vs Sheridan Meltsner4-6, 2-6
2024-07-01vs *4-EWyngaarden-HRSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNancy Pack vs Mary Tusing6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Tiffany Langino3-6, 4-6
2024-06-24vs *3-PostRust/McGill-DFCWon 10
W#2 SinglesNancy Pack vs Susie Post-Rust6-0, 6-1
2024-06-17vs *2-JPerry-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Jenny Perry6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRoberta Hadley vs Andy Blackburn6-0, 7-6
2024-06-10vs *4-EWyngaarden-HRLost 02
L#2 SinglesRoberta Hadley vs Beth Huebner0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesPamela Hankerson vs Anne Sherow5-7, 1-6
2024-06-03vs *3-PostRust/McGill-DFCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNancy Pack vs Chanel Chambers7-5, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Susie Post-Rust5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-05-20vs *2-JPerry-CHTCLost 01
L#2 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Jenny Perry6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Nancy Pack
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.77
Carolyn Lee
published 4
3.64
Meghan Rider
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.57
Emily Childs
published
3.39
Roberta Hadley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Pamela Hankerson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberta Hadley + Pamela Hankerson121647% games+9.6% vs expected
Emily Childs + Meghan Rider2548% games+5.3% vs expected
Nancy Pack + Meghan Rider6260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nancy Pack
295W–89L career · 4 lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
4.02
4
Carolyn Lee
26W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Meghan Rider
341W–169L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Emily Childs
31W–33L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Roberta Hadley
245W–120L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Pamela Hankerson
96W–202L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.