Teams

TRC:Tennis Tempest:Chen

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-19vs 4S:The Missfits:MalagisiWon 30
W#1 DoublesLoralie Held / Irene Lazarus vs Cristina Mella / Elise Hinchey2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNatallia Baranouskaya vs Meng Zhang6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJudy Dalaker / Nan Wang vs Timothea Mclaughlin / Charlotte Robson6-3, 6-4
2026-07-16vs WRC:No Strings Attached:DebnathWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Dalaker / Irene Lazarus vs Pallavi Debnath / Taly Farber6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMedalissa Kampmann vs Lori Barshop4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesQian Wang / Nan Wang vs Patricia Chen / Andrea Gerber6-2, 6-0
2026-07-12vs TCT:2.5 18+ Women: Rosenfeld/PaganoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudy Dalaker / Qian Wang vs Marybeth D' Amico / Ashleigh Pascarella1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMedalissa Kampmann / Adriana Nunes vs Hortense Greco / Megan Clark6-0, 6-0
2026-06-28vs TCT:2.5 Racquettes:BuschauerWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Grosso / Adriana Nunes vs Caroline Uscilla / Van Vu6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNatallia Baranouskaya vs Helena Plavec6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLoralie Held / Nan Wang vs Karen Dellert / Michele Vaccaro6-1, 6-1
2026-06-14vs WRC:No Strings Attached:DebnathLost 12
L#1 DoublesIrene Lazarus / Loralie Held vs Taly Farber / Loreen Beaudry5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesQian Wang vs Lori Barshop3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMedalissa Kampmann / Kimberly Grosso vs Elizabeth Zhao / Laura Connell6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLoralie Held / Sherry D'Elia vs Jeni Applegate / Ashleigh Pascarella3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNatallia Baranouskaya vs Orsi Rosenfeld6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Grosso / Adriana Nunes vs Pauline Pan / Marybeth D' Amico6-1, 6-1
2026-05-17vs TCT:2.5 Racquettes:BuschauerLost 03
L#1 DoublesLoralie Held / Natallia Baranouskaya vs Janet Striuli / Margarethe Van Der Tuin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesIrene Lazarus vs Astrid Alvarez Clavijo3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMedalissa Kampmann / Nan Wang vs Caroline Uscilla / Van Vu3-6, 2-6
2026-05-02vs 4S:The Missfits:MalagisiWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Grosso / Judy Dalaker vs Cristina Mella / Erika Long6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNatallia Baranouskaya vs Elise Hinchey6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesQian Wang / Nan Wang vs Charlotte Robson / Maria Mayer Feng6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCT:2.5 Racquettes:Buschauer0816715169
2TRC:Tennis Tempest:Chen0816820167
34S:The Racquettes:Conklin08141020181
4MIT: Milford Indoor Tennis: Kuehn/Lorenzetti0816821200
5TRC:Doubles Dare:Donnelly/Hartnagel0814923215
6TCT:The Racquet Rebels:Godsill08111226200
7FIT:Fairfield Dropshots:Brant08101328212
8TCT:2.5 18+ Women: Rosenfeld/Pagano08101429217
9WRC:No Strings Attached:Debnath08101231239
104S:The Missfits:Malagisi0861737250
11NEW:You Got Served:Kaplan0851839266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Adriana Nunes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
Nan Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Natallia Baranouskaya
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.39
Kimberly Grosso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Qian Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.33
Sherry D'Elia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Loralie Held
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.23
Irene Lazarus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.19
Medalissa Kampmann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.12
Judy Dalaker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Dalaker + Loralie Held1834% games−7.1% vs expected
Loralie Held + Kimberly Grosso1538% games−9.6% vs expected
Judy Dalaker + Kimberly Grosso224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Adriana Nunes
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
Nan Wang
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
Natallia Baranouskaya
10W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Kimberly Grosso
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Qian Wang
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Sherry D'Elia
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Loralie Held
18W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Irene Lazarus
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Medalissa Kampmann
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Judy Dalaker
21W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.