Teams

TRC:Doubles Dare:Donnelly/Hartnagel

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 2.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-19vs FIT:Fairfield Dropshots:BrantWon 21
W#1 DoublesTara Donnelly / Jamie Ringel vs Veronica Matarese / Kristen Sasso6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmelia Fogarty vs Jessie Knopp6-3, 6-5
L#2 DoublesRebecca Morris / Shalia Garnett vs Stacey Gorman / Julia Snowden3-6, 3-6
2026-07-12vs TCT:The Racquet Rebels:GodsillLost 12
W#1 DoublesTara Donnelly / Gabrielle Conway vs Lisa Durkee / Lihui Lin7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLeigh Hartnagel vs Alison Godsill6-7, 5-3
L#2 DoublesRose Piccolo / Amy Cherrez vs Ambar Picon / Ann Weiss0-6, 3-6
2026-06-28vs 4S:The Racquettes:ConklinWon 30
W#1 DoublesTara Donnelly / Gabrielle Conway vs Michele Conklin / Ann Sheehy6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmelia Fogarty vs Elizabeth Seel1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRose Piccolo / Rebecca Morris vs Jennifer Montanaro / Patty Hyatt6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesHelen Clarke / Tara Donnelly vs Sunaina Vijay / Viola Li6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeigh Hartnagel vs Jennifer Kuehn3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Bartek / Shalia Garnett vs Yasheen Gao / Estibaliz Garria3-6, 2-6
2026-06-14vs NEW:You Got Served:KaplanWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Elliott / Gabrielle Conway vs Rachel Waldstreicher / Carolyn Roth7-6, 5-5
W#1 SinglesJamie Ringel vs Allegra Mcbane6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Cherrez / Rebecca Morris vs Kim Juretic-bloom / Elisa Moriconi7-6, 5-2
2026-06-12vs FIT:Fairfield Dropshots:BrantLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Ringel / Sarah Elliott vs Jen Landolt / Kristen Sasso6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmelia Fogarty vs Julia Hood6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Bartek / Amy Cherrez vs Clare Epstein / Stacey Gorman2-6, 3-6
2026-05-17vs NEW:You Got Served:KaplanWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Clarke / Sarah Elliott vs Renee Finnegan / Allegra Mcbane6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLaura Tormey vs Marla Lewis6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSalma Afifi / Kathryn Steiner vs Lacey Ramsey / Kim Juretic-bloom5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-04-26vs TCT:The Racquet Rebels:GodsillWon 21
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Conway / Leigh Hartnagel vs Lihui Lin / Anette Young7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJamie Ringel vs Alison Godsill0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShalia Garnett / Yuliya Novikava vs Gloria Perez / Ann Weiss4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCT:2.5 Racquettes:Buschauer0816715169
2TRC:Tennis Tempest:Chen0816820167
34S:The Racquettes:Conklin08141020181
4MIT: Milford Indoor Tennis: Kuehn/Lorenzetti0816821200
5TRC:Doubles Dare:Donnelly/Hartnagel0814923215
6TCT:The Racquet Rebels:Godsill08111226200
7FIT:Fairfield Dropshots:Brant08101328212
8TCT:2.5 18+ Women: Rosenfeld/Pagano08101429217
9WRC:No Strings Attached:Debnath08101231239
104S:The Missfits:Malagisi0861737250
11NEW:You Got Served:Kaplan0851839266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
Amelia Fogarty
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Gabrielle Conway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Jamie Ringel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.27
Leigh Hartnagel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.23
Rebecca Morris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Shalia Garnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.93
Suzanne Bartek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.93
Amy Cherrez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Helen Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Steiner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Tormey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rose Piccolo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Salma Afifi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yuliya Novikava
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Amelia Fogarty
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Gabrielle Conway
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Jamie Ringel
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Leigh Hartnagel
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Rebecca Morris
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Shalia Garnett
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Suzanne Bartek
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
2.5
Amy Cherrez
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Helen Clarke
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathryn Steiner
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Laura Tormey
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rose Piccolo
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Salma Afifi
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yuliya Novikava
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.