Teams

4S:The Racquettes:Conklin

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-19vs NEW:You Got Served:KaplanWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichele Conklin / Nicole Opalinski vs Rachel Waldstreicher / Carolyn Roth6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNipa Urbanz vs Anna Phelan6-4, 6-5
W#2 DoublesLinda Gross / Kathy Reale vs Lacey Ramsey / Marla Lewis6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesPamela Murphy / Kathy Reale vs Yasheen Gao / Estibaliz Garria7-6, 3-3
L#1 SinglesNipa Urbanz vs Sunaina Vijay4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatty Hyatt / Elizabeth Seel vs Gwen Grosso / Holly Bernstein6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesMichele Conklin / Ann Sheehy vs Tara Donnelly / Gabrielle Conway1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Seel vs Amelia Fogarty6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Montanaro / Patty Hyatt vs Rose Piccolo / Rebecca Morris0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-20vs NEW:You Got Served:KaplanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Conklin / Pamela Murphy vs Hilary Bergman / Anna Phelan2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNipa Urbanz / Linda Gross vs Renee Finnegan / Allegra Mcbane6-3, 6-2
2026-06-06vs TCT:The Racquet Rebels:GodsillWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathy Reale / Jennifer Montanaro vs Alison Godsill / Anette Young3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKiersten Halstead vs Ambar Picon6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Sheehy / Nipa Urbanz vs Heajung Chang / Lisa Durkee6-0, 6-2
2026-05-31vs FIT:Fairfield Dropshots:BrantSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Gross / Patty Hyatt vs Jen Landolt / Jessie Knopp2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNipa Urbanz vs Marisa Pilipshen6-3, 7-5
2026-05-17vs TCT:The Racquet Rebels:GodsillWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Conklin / Jennifer Montanaro vs Heajung Chang / Ambar Picon7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNicole Opalinski vs Anette Young6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKathy Reale / Jennifer Montanaro vs Sunaina Vijay / Holly Gill7-6, 2-2
L#1 SinglesKiersten Halstead vs Jennifer Kuehn4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Conklin / Nicole Opalinski vs Estibaliz Garria / Viola Li6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCT:2.5 Racquettes:Buschauer0816715169
2TRC:Tennis Tempest:Chen0816820167
34S:The Racquettes:Conklin08141020181
4MIT: Milford Indoor Tennis: Kuehn/Lorenzetti0816821200
5TRC:Doubles Dare:Donnelly/Hartnagel0814923215
6TCT:The Racquet Rebels:Godsill08111226200
7FIT:Fairfield Dropshots:Brant08101328212
8TCT:2.5 18+ Women: Rosenfeld/Pagano08101429217
9WRC:No Strings Attached:Debnath08101231239
104S:The Missfits:Malagisi0861737250
11NEW:You Got Served:Kaplan0851839266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Nipa Urbanz
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.41
Kiersten Halstead
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.38
Nicole Opalinski
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ann Sheehy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.21
Kathy Reale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Elizabeth Seel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.16
Pamela Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Jennifer Montanaro
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.14
Patty Hyatt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.05
Michele Conklin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.04
Linda Gross
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Katie Sullivan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Hyatt + Linda Gross123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Reale + Jennifer Montanaro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nipa Urbanz
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Kiersten Halstead
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
Nicole Opalinski
22W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Ann Sheehy
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Reale
18W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Elizabeth Seel
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Pamela Murphy
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Jennifer Montanaro
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Patty Hyatt
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Michele Conklin
5W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Linda Gross
18W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Katie Sullivan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.