Teams

Cooper-Octavi/18/5.5/CWN/STCC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 Shrev

13 players · average NTRP 2.79 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Sep 21 6:00 PM
vs Rosie Cooper-NearyJennifer Octavi
Southern Trace Country Club
Sep 28 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
2026-08-31vs Swanson/18/5.5/CWN/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Octavi / Shannon Davidson vs Lisa Kellogg / Amanda Urian6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRosie Cooper-Neary / Kimberly Moore vs Tammy Rhodes / Olivia Goldman1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Gibbs / Gail Brown vs Toni Goodin / Sara Holt0-6, 0-6
2026-08-24vs Middlebrook/18/5.5/CWN/POTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKimberly Moore / Jennifer Octavi vs Parisa Zamani / Kelly Schmidt6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Kallenberg / Sarah Baker vs Cynthia Jones / Dawn Rickman1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAimee Deere / Cindy Shaw vs Katie Rickert / Melissa Olivier5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-17vs Gonzalez/18/5.5/CWN/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Octavi / Christiana Lyons vs Lana Wray / Heather Pearson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Kallenberg / Kate Patty vs Morgan Goodwin / Jessica Davis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Shaw / Sarah Young vs Lori Johnson / Katherine Firmin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 5.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Teague-Griffin/18/5.5/CWN/QTC2042554
2Cooper-Octavi/18/5.5/CWN/STCC1030326
3Slusher/5.5/18/CWN/POTC1142550
4Gibson-Hale/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1142649
5Gonzalez/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1133749
6Wagg/18/5.5/CWN/QTC1133751
7Luttkus-Wood/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1133764
8Swanson/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1124958
9Melvin/18/5.5/CWN/QTC1124960
10Gullatt-Roll/18/5.5/CWN/STCC0103639
11Middlebrook/18/5.5/CWN/POTC0224962

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Jennifer Octavi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Heidi Kallenberg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Cindy Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Gail Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Rosie Cooper-Neary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Caroline Hand
published 3
2.35
Kate Patty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Sarah Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.27
Shannon Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Kimberly Moore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.16
Aimee Deere
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.91
Lauren Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.91
Christiana Lyons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Deere + Kimberly Moore3443% games+9.3% vs expected
Rosie Cooper-Neary + Jennifer Octavi6551% games+7.3% vs expected
Caroline Hand + Jennifer Octavi1542% games−0.9% vs expected
Gail Brown + Heidi Kallenberg1441% games−3.3% vs expected
Cindy Shaw + Heidi Kallenberg2539% games−9.0% vs expected
Kate Patty + Sarah Young134 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Shaw + Gail Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Shaw + Jennifer Octavi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Octavi
35W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Heidi Kallenberg
25W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Cindy Shaw
11W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Gail Brown
27W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Rosie Cooper-Neary
10W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Caroline Hand
10W–34L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.38
Kate Patty
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
2.5
Sarah Young
14W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Shannon Davidson
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Kimberly Moore
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Aimee Deere
10W–32L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Lauren Gibbs
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
2.5
Christiana Lyons
2W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.