Teams

Slusher/5.5/18/CWN/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 Shrev

17 players · average NTRP 2.88 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 21 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Meghan Slusher
Sep 28 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
2026-08-31vs Gullatt-Roll/18/5.5/CWN/STCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Jeter / Nikki Hanna vs Lowery Reiland / Leah Regard6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Comeaux / Katherine Roberts vs Erin Gullatt / Molly Quinnett6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJennifer McGimsey / Beth Geneux vs Afton Slack / Holyn Kosh4-6, 4-6
2026-08-24vs Luttkus-Wood/18/5.5/CWN/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Hardin / Susannah Ferris vs Emily Bush / Sarah Beth Yokem6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLynette Campisi / Katherine Adams vs Wendy Reynolds / Susan English6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLindsey Cotton / Megan Pearce vs Shelly Boudreau / Lori Lewis7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-17vs Teague-Griffin/18/5.5/CWN/QTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynette Campisi / Anne Thomas vs Kelly Carby / Erica McCain3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary-Frances Haynes / Janelle M Leonard vs Holli Griffin / Liz Navarre6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMeghan Slusher / Jennifer McGimsey vs Jennifer Sanderson / Shannon Peck3-6, 3-6
2026-08-10vs Swanson/18/5.5/CWN/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesConcetta Chevallier / Megan Pearce vs Lisa Kellogg / Amanda Williams7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusannah Ferris / Ashley Hardin vs Toni Goodin / Carrie Smith6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLindsey Cotton / Katherine Roberts vs Tammy Rhodes / Kelly Wheeler6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 5.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Teague-Griffin/18/5.5/CWN/QTC2042554
2Cooper-Octavi/18/5.5/CWN/STCC1030326
3Slusher/5.5/18/CWN/POTC1142550
4Gibson-Hale/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1142649
5Gonzalez/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1133749
6Wagg/18/5.5/CWN/QTC1133751
7Luttkus-Wood/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1133764
8Swanson/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1124958
9Melvin/18/5.5/CWN/QTC1124960
10Gullatt-Roll/18/5.5/CWN/STCC0103639
11Middlebrook/18/5.5/CWN/POTC0224962

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Caroline Jeter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Lynette Campisi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Mary-Frances Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Concetta Chevallier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Katie Comeaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Lindsey Cotton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ashley Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Meghan Slusher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Leslie Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Jennifer McGimsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Janelle M Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.43
Megan Pearce
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Katherine Adams
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.30
Beth Geneux
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.14
Nikki Hanna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Stanley
published
Susannah Ferris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Slusher + Jennifer McGimsey12460% games+9.7% vs expected
Mary-Frances Haynes + Lynette Campisi9259% games+4.2% vs expected
Caroline Jeter + Katie Comeaux11462% games+2.6% vs expected
Nikki Hanna + Meghan Slusher2348% games−0.9% vs expected
Katherine Adams + Janelle M Leonard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Jeter
34W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lynette Campisi
67W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.98
Mary-Frances Haynes
60W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Concetta Chevallier
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Katie Comeaux
35W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lindsey Cotton
44W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Ashley Hardin
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Meghan Slusher
37W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.62
Leslie Hill
14W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Jennifer McGimsey
21W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Janelle M Leonard
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Megan Pearce
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43
Katherine Adams
13W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Beth Geneux
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
Nikki Hanna
11W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Lauren Stanley
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susannah Ferris
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.