Teams

Gibson-Hale/18/5.5/CWN/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 Shrev

17 players · average NTRP 2.83 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 21 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Sep 28 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
2026-08-24vs Gullatt-Roll/18/5.5/CWN/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesValarie Thiels / Jacqueline Gibson vs Leigh Ann Madole / Elizabeth Wadhwa6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeredith Graf / Elisha Coats vs Molly Quinnett / Halani Roll7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLyndzee McConathy / Georgie Sutton vs Jennifer Hand / Laura Allen6-1, 6-1
2026-08-17vs Luttkus-Wood/18/5.5/CWN/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeredith Graf / Lyndzee McConathy vs Meghan Brown / Emily Bush6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesValarie Thiels / Jacqueline Gibson vs Alison Luttkus / Peri Reed7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Floyd / Camille Rhoads vs Ashley Paz / Kaitlin Wood4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-10vs Teague-Griffin/18/5.5/CWN/QTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeorgie Sutton / Kayte Hollowell vs Ally Howerter / Judy Rose4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Sain / Jacqueline Gibson vs Amanda Teague / Erica McCain3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBrin Hammond / Paige Ferrant vs Shelly Fielder / Shelby McCarty6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 5.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Teague-Griffin/18/5.5/CWN/QTC2042554
2Cooper-Octavi/18/5.5/CWN/STCC1030326
3Slusher/5.5/18/CWN/POTC1142550
4Gibson-Hale/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1142649
5Gonzalez/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1133749
6Wagg/18/5.5/CWN/QTC1133751
7Luttkus-Wood/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1133764
8Swanson/18/5.5/CWN/BTC1124958
9Melvin/18/5.5/CWN/QTC1124960
10Gullatt-Roll/18/5.5/CWN/STCC0103639
11Middlebrook/18/5.5/CWN/POTC0224962

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Valarie Thiels
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Heather Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Amanda Hale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Kayte Hollowell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Lyndzee McConathy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Holly Sain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Elisha Coats
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Brin Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Meredith Graf
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
K Lyn Castro
published
2.41
Tanika Nash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Paige Ferrant
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Georgie Sutton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.32
Jacqueline Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Laura Cope
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.21
Camille Rhoads
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Lauren Ocmand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Sain + Kayte Hollowell4261% games+15.8% vs expected
Amanda Hale + Kayte Hollowell2351% games+6.5% vs expected
Valarie Thiels + Heather Floyd16658% games+5.2% vs expected
Jacqueline Gibson + Amanda Hale404 matchesnot enough data
Holly Sain + K Lyn Castro213 matchesnot enough data
Holly Sain + Lyndzee McConathy213 matchesnot enough data
Valarie Thiels + Jacqueline Gibson213 matchesnot enough data
Elisha Coats + Lyndzee McConathy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Valarie Thiels
74W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Heather Floyd
59W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Amanda Hale
46W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Kayte Hollowell
35W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Lyndzee McConathy
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Holly Sain
30W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Elisha Coats
43W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Brin Hammond
22W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
Meredith Graf
17W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.67
K Lyn Castro
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Tanika Nash
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Paige Ferrant
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Georgie Sutton
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Jacqueline Gibson
31W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Laura Cope
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Camille Rhoads
6W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Lauren Ocmand
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.