Teams

NITA W 85CWb South Barrington-Reyna

2025 NITA2 Winterz Combo 18 & Over · NITA Winter 8.5 Combo Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.19 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesGinger Riessen / Gayle Dominicis vs Kristine Jurczyk / Marialin Lomongo2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Donnelly / Debra Brambora vs Michelle Lee / Huan Chang3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesOzlen Er / Miriam Abe vs Illana Hodges / Emily Doyle7-6, 6-3
2025-04-05vs NITA W 85CWc Courts Plus-CushingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlison Donnelly / Debra Brambora vs Carole Wittemann / Tracie Wilcox1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMiriam Abe / Ginger Riessen vs Molly McGinnis / MEREDITH BETTCHER6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-22vs NITA W 85CWf Rush Copley-AdamsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHoda Elshakankery / Gayle Dominicis vs Ann Ko / Leslie McClure5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Reyna / Masako Ueda vs Lisa Vlach / Lisa Waugh6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-09vs NITA W 85CWd Score-KnutteLost 03
L#1 DoublesHoda Elshakankery / Gayle Dominicis vs Ayah Kamel / Marinne Leonard4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGinger Riessen / KAREN MAJERCZAK vs Liz Urban / Margaret Weiss0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Brambora / Anitra Willis vs Laurie Knutte / Michelle Perry1-6, 1-6
2025-02-08vs NITA W 85CWc Courts Plus-CushingLost 02
L#1 DoublesMiriam Abe / Ginger Riessen vs Rachel Corrough / Molly McGinnis7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebra Brambora / Ozlen Er vs Tracy Richards / Nancy Cushing2-6, 3-6
2025-02-02vs NITA W 85CWf Rush Copley-AdamsLost 12
W#1 DoublesHoda Elshakankery / Gayle Dominicis vs Ann Ko / Anna Hartford6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKAREN MAJERCZAK / Debra Brambora vs Lisa Waugh / Ellen Elliot4-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesMiriam Abe / Anitra Willis vs Andrea Galligan Kuc / Cindy Sullivan6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NITA Winter 8.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA W 85CWd Score-Knutte6218615151
2NITA W 85CWc Courts Plus-Cushing6216820177
3NITA W 85CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura53141024204
4NITA W 85CWf Rush Copley-Adams3581634234
5WITHDREW-NITA W 85CWa Bannockburn-Sheldon000000
6NITA W 85CWb South Barrington-Reyna0842042272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Debbie Reyna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Hoda Elshakankery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Ginger Riessen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Masako Ueda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Alison Donnelly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.79
Miriam Abe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
KAREN MAJERCZAK
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Gayle Dominicis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Anitra Willis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Debra Brambora
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Ozlen Er
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Brambora + Hoda Elshakankery24467% games+9.3% vs expected
Debra Brambora + Alison Donnelly1442% games+2.8% vs expected
Hoda Elshakankery + Gayle Dominicis632059% games+2.4% vs expected
Alison Donnelly + Gayle Dominicis5257% games+2.4% vs expected
Debbie Reyna + Hoda Elshakankery51149% games+0.1% vs expected
Debbie Reyna + KAREN MAJERCZAK5351% games−2.2% vs expected
Debbie Reyna + Miriam Abe7352% games−2.9% vs expected
Alison Donnelly + KAREN MAJERCZAK0731% games−13.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Debbie Reyna
130W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Hoda Elshakankery
216W–111L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Ginger Riessen
244W–127L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Masako Ueda
166W–96L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
4.5
Alison Donnelly
119W–95L career · 2 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.84
Miriam Abe
64W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
KAREN MAJERCZAK
160W–108L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Gayle Dominicis
229W–135L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Anitra Willis
88W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Debra Brambora
180W–106L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Ozlen Er
43W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.