Teams

NITA W 85CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura

2025 NITA2 Winterz Combo 18 & Over · NITA Winter 8.5 Combo Women

21 players · average NTRP 4.21 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-27Won 20
W#1 DoublesCrystal Leighton / Alexandra Lichtor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDawn Baumann / Taya Zoubareva vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-25vs NITA W 85CWc Courts Plus-CushingLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartha Davis / Mary Therese Lee vs Molly McGinnis / Carole Wittemann7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSophia Koliatsis / Ayano Nakamura vs Jessica Grizzell / Ann Murtaugh6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCrystal Leighton / Christine Campanelli vs Rachel Corrough / Nancy Cushing4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKristine Jurczyk / Marialin Lomongo vs Ginger Riessen / Gayle Dominicis6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichelle Lee / Huan Chang vs Alison Donnelly / Debra Brambora6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesIllana Hodges / Emily Doyle vs Ozlen Er / Miriam Abe6-7, 3-6
2025-03-23vs NITA W 85CWc Courts Plus-CushingLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lee / Ashley Kaufman vs Nancy Cushing / Rachel Corrough6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Lichtor / Martha Davis vs Molly McGinnis / Carole Wittemann3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGrace Kuhrt / Sophia Chang Stauffer vs Cathy Packer / Tracy Richards6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-21vs NITA W 85CWd Score-KnutteWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Mixon / Katherine Martin vs Leigh Champagne / Dana Shannon6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDawn Baumann / Taya Zoubareva vs Kristine Lonsway / Janet Wolf6-4, 6-5
L#3 DoublesMarialin Lomongo / Sophia Koliatsis vs Jill Odenbeck / Sue DeMari3-6, 5-3, 1-0
2025-03-16vs NITA W 85CWf Rush Copley-AdamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Martin / Michelle Lee vs Leslie McClure / Lisa Vlach6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSoraya McTeague / Andrea Galligan Kuc vs Christine Campanelli / Dawn Baumann - *3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGrace Kuhrt / Ashley Kaufman - * vs Lisa Waugh / Ellen Elliot6-2, 6-1
2025-03-02vs NITA W 85CWd Score-KnutteWon 21
W#1 DoublesAyano Nakamura / Martha Davis vs Ayah Kamel / Kristy Sweigard6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Campanelli / Kristine Jurczyk vs Jennifer McClelland / Cindy Bielik3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Doyle / Illana Hodges vs Dana Shannon / Margaret Weiss7-6, 5-3
2025-01-19vs NITA W 85CWf Rush Copley-AdamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarialin Lomongo / Martha Davis vs Leslie McClure / Andrea Galligan Kuc6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSophia Chang Stauffer / Mary Therese Lee vs Soraya McTeague / Carlene Motto6-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesGrace Kuhrt / Huan Chang vs Cindy Sullivan / Ann Ko6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NITA Winter 8.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA W 85CWd Score-Knutte6218615151
2NITA W 85CWc Courts Plus-Cushing6216820177
3NITA W 85CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura53141024204
4NITA W 85CWf Rush Copley-Adams3581634234
5WITHDREW-NITA W 85CWa Bannockburn-Sheldon000000
6NITA W 85CWb South Barrington-Reyna0842042272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Taya Zoubareva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.37
Ayano Nakamura
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.33
Heather Mixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.32
Marialin Lomongo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Christine Campanelli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Emily Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Grace Kuhrt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Mary Therese Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.08
Crystal Leighton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
4.05
Alexandra Lichtor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Huan Chang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.97
Michelle Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
Dawn Baumann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Kristine Jurczyk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
Sophia Chang Stauffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ashley Kaufman
published 4
3.75
Illana Hodges
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Sophia Koliatsis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Denise Lam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Martha Davis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Davis + Crystal Leighton8075% games+21.1% vs expected
Martha Davis + Ayano Nakamura7059% games+15.8% vs expected
Heather Mixon + Mary Therese Lee7457% games+14.1% vs expected
Sophia Koliatsis + Christine Campanelli6067% games+12.6% vs expected
Sophia Koliatsis + Ayano Nakamura6065% games+11.5% vs expected
Martha Davis + Ashley Kaufman7064% games+10.6% vs expected
Crystal Leighton + Grace Kuhrt24764% games+8.5% vs expected
Martha Davis + Michelle Lee12563% games+7.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Taya Zoubareva
125W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Ayano Nakamura
286W–110L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
Heather Mixon
49W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
4.33
4.5
Marialin Lomongo
322W–137L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Christine Campanelli
287W–133L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Emily Doyle
132W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
4.24
4.5
Grace Kuhrt
134W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Mary Therese Lee
183W–110L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
4.17
4
Crystal Leighton
308W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
4.08
4.5
Alexandra Lichtor
87W–96L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.05
Huan Chang
178W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Michelle Lee
155W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4.5
Kristine Jurczyk
327W–126L career · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
4
Sophia Chang Stauffer
97W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Ashley Kaufman
43W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Illana Hodges
164W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Sophia Koliatsis
334W–192L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Denise Lam
315W–90L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Martha Davis
321W–153L career · 5 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Fra Angelica Farinas- Wright
62W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.