Teams

Naples YMCA

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over Spring · 4.5 Women Adult 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 4.33 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-05vs COLLIER/Gustafson/Adult18&over4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMacKenzie Kraft / Karen Defiore vs Dana Wagoner / Laura Jolly1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hansen / Rosa Thakkar vs Kristie McCormick / Chrissy Rogers2-6, 2-6
2025-05-05vs COLLIER/Gustafson/Adult18&over4.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesRosa Thakkar / Flora Rodriguez vs Chrissy Rogers / Dayna Webre4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-04-28vs COLLIER/Gustafson/Adult18&over4.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesRosa Thakkar / Jennifer Hansen vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / Kristie McCormick3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMacey Tyll / MacKenzie Kraft vs Carrie Stowell / Gina Adiutori7-6, 7-5
2025-04-14vs COLLIER/Gustafson/Adult18&over4.5WLost 02
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Matje / Lynn Johns vs Tara Newhall / Dana Wagoner2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMira Rochford / MacKenzie Kraft vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / Kristie McCormick4-6, 5-7
2025-04-07vs COLLIER/Gustafson/Adult18&over4.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Matje / MacKenzie Kraft vs Dayna Webre / Diana Wong4-6, 3-6
2025-03-31vs COLLIER/Gustafson/Adult18&over4.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesRosa Thakkar / Flora Rodriguez vs Dayna Webre / Kristie McCormick1-6, 0-6
2025-03-24vs COLLIER/Gustafson/Adult18&over4.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMira Rochford / Rosa Thakkar vs Nicki Sebold / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Lynn Johns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Nada Pivcevic
published
4.19
Jane Jhanji
published
4.16
Sara Wachs
published
4.14
Flora Rodriguez
published 4.5
4.08
Tracy Maurer
published
4.08
Stephanie Foley
published
4.00
Karen Defiore
published
4.00
MacKenzie Kraft
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.99
Jennifer Hansen
published
3.96
Carolyn Matje
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Macey Tyll
published
3.87
Cheryl Cohen
published 4.5
3.78
Mira Rochford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Rosa Thakkar
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Wachs + Lynn Johns19956% games−2.9% vs expected
Sara Wachs + Carolyn Matje3246% gamesnot enough data
MacKenzie Kraft + Mira Rochford134 matchesnot enough data
Mira Rochford + Carolyn Matje044 matchesnot enough data
Jane Jhanji + Cheryl Cohen134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Jhanji + Tracy Maurer134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Jhanji + Carolyn Matje314 matchesnot enough data
Sara Wachs + Mira Rochford123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Johns
114W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Nada Pivcevic
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Jane Jhanji
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Sara Wachs
147W–89L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Flora Rodriguez
10W–24L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
Tracy Maurer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Stephanie Foley
39W–27L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Karen Defiore
16W–32L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
4.00
MacKenzie Kraft
26W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
4.00
Jennifer Hansen
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Carolyn Matje
59W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Macey Tyll
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4.5
Cheryl Cohen
82W–56L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.87
Mira Rochford
48W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.78
Rosa Thakkar
46W–83L career · 10 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.