Teams

OC Team Courage LPC - Nisha - Sat1

2024 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekend

27 players · average NTRP 3.55 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-13vs OC LNRC - Elyzabeth - Sat1030Won 10
W#3 DoublesCrosby Burke / Pam Schuler vs Rachel Lee / Cynthia Lay6-4, 6-1
2024-09-21vs OC LPC - DebraWon 20
W#1 DoublesLilyAnne Rice / Meera Shier vs Michelle Sinclair / Yuka Nabangxang6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShiva Shokouhi / Pam Schuler vs Jing Dong / Huanan Sun5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSabrina MacLachlan / Gretchen Cuzick vs Hye Jin Robertson / Meng-Chieh Lee2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTomoe Stevens / Yukiyo Matsushita vs Susie Kim / Leslie Le5-7, 1-6
2024-09-07vs Gates/SoCal/TriLevel4.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesKelley McBride / Pam Schuler vs Natalie McDaniel / Rosette McClave5-7, 3-6
2024-08-25vs OC Irvine Heritage - Dianne - Sun1Split 11
W#1 DoublesMeera Shier / Sabrina MacLachlan vs Holly Bruning / Yolanda Barocio6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaeko Jenni / Yukiyo Matsushita vs Dianne Tanger / Diane Kim5-7, 4-6
2024-08-10vs OC LPC - DebraWon 20
W#2 DoublesEmily McKinney / Gretchen Cuzick vs Jing Dong / Jing Li6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelley McBride / Pam Schuler vs Annie Huang / Deping Liu4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMeera Shier / Sabrina MacLachlan vs Gloria Medina / Tricia Bregman6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 26 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Sheryl Tran
published
3.91
Meera Shier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Olivia Hu
published
3.68
Sabrina MacLachlan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Emily McKinney
published
3.55
Caroline Gee
published 4
3.52
Gretchen Cuzick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Crosby Burke
published 3.5
3.38
Julie Le
published
3.37
Shiva Shokouhi
published
3.36
Yukiyo Matsushita
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Nisha Anish
published
3.29
Allegra Fulcher
published 3.5
3.27
Kaeko Jenni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Jenny Thurrell
published
3.16
Tomoe Stevens
published
3.13
Pam Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Patty Rydelski
published
3.04
Roya Khairzada
published
3.03
Sheri Kumsakul
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Motomi Kawase
published
3.01
Kelley McBride
published
3.00
Tiffney Beckloff
published
2.91
Joan Levis
published
2.87
Amee Patel
published 3
2.85
Suzi Kim
published
Zheng Hua
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaeko Jenni + Yukiyo Matsushita101051% games−7.5% vs expected
Sabrina MacLachlan + Meera Shier4259% gamesnot enough data
Shiva Shokouhi + Gretchen Cuzick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheryl Tran
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Meera Shier
64W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
Olivia Hu
72W–65L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
Sabrina MacLachlan
190W–130L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Emily McKinney
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.58
4
Caroline Gee
26W–17L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Gretchen Cuzick
133W–84L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.52
3.5
Crosby Burke
22W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Julie Le
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Shiva Shokouhi
19W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Yukiyo Matsushita
46W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.36
Nisha Anish
27W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.36
3.5
Allegra Fulcher
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Kaeko Jenni
93W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Jenny Thurrell
20W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.26
Tomoe Stevens
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Pam Schuler
93W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Patty Rydelski
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.10
Roya Khairzada
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Sheri Kumsakul
38W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Motomi Kawase
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Kelley McBride
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
Tiffney Beckloff
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Joan Levis
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Amee Patel
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
Suzi Kim
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Zheng Hua
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.