Teams

The Lakeland CC 3.0 - C. Phillips

2025 Polk (NA) Casual League · 3.0 Plus

20 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-11-19Split 11
L#2 Female DoublesJaimi Miller / Elizabeth Paul vs Danielle Miller / Geraldine Tardy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#5 Female DoublesSandra Campisi / Sheryl Norman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-18Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesLamanda Petcoff / Sheryl Norman vs Anna Previte / Courtney Wade1-6, 1-6
2025-10-28Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCourtney Phillips / Sheryl Norman vs Julie Hartline / Lauren Lloyd6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-21Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesCourtney Phillips / Sheryl Norman vs Stephanie Barron / Courtney McCrystal6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesSheryl Norman / Jaimi Miller vs Cindy Burgess / Hetal Rajguru3-6, 4-6
2025-10-07vs Beerman - N. EscowitzWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesAmy Evans / Jaimi Miller vs Alexandra Henderson / Vanessa Barfield6-2, 6-0
W#3 Female DoublesLamanda Petcoff / Sheryl Norman vs Ashley Mcentire / Karli Hughes6-1, 6-3
L#2 Female DoublesLamanda Petcoff / Sheryl Norman vs Marcia Whitney / Paige Turner3-6, 6-7
2025-09-16vs Aces Angels Beerman - R. EspitiaLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesSheryl Norman / Lamanda Petcoff vs Anna Previte / Jihyeon Choe5-7, 4-6
2025-09-09Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesJaimi Miller / Brandy Lansford vs Desiree Tchipanova / Anna Clark0-6, 1-6
2025-09-02Split 11
W#2 Female DoublesJaimi Miller / Brandy Lansford vs Hannah Taylor / Leilani Guinn7-6, 7-5
L#5 Female DoublesDonna Mcwilliams / Carey Campbell vs Jennifer Chevalier / Kristan Sheffield1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesSheryl Norman / Courtney Phillips vs Tracey Ritter / Catherine Futch2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#4 Female DoublesJaimi Miller / Brandy Lansford vs Clara Copley / Sandy Smyth6-4, 6-2
2025-08-19vs Beerman - N. EscowitzWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesJaimi Miller / Shannon Miles vs Jenilee Coconato / Zee Rodriguez6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Plus have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ruthie Tait
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.25
Lauren Clark
published
2.96
Shannon Miles
published
2.81
Jaimi Miller
usually #2 Female Doubles 57%, also #1 Female Doubles 29% · published 3
2.78
Elizabeth Paul
published
2.78
Sheryl Norman
usually #2 Female Doubles 44%, also #3 Female Doubles 22% · published
Carey Campbell
usually #5 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Courtney Larson
published 3
2.65
Lamanda Petcoff
published
2.65
Brandy Lansford
published 3
2.64
2.63
Sandra Campisi
published
2.60
Jane Phillips
published
2.57
Ginny Houghton
published
2.54
Rachel Hollis
published
2.51
Deanna Bayless
published 3
2.46
Hilary Crenshaw
published
2.45
Leah Grieger
published
2.44
Stacey Weeks
published
2.28
Donna Mcwilliams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheryl Norman + Jaimi Miller4447% gamesnot enough data
Sheryl Norman + Ruthie Tait5058% gamesnot enough data
Sheryl Norman + Elizabeth Paul033 matchesnot enough data
Jaimi Miller + Ruthie Tait303 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Crenshaw + Courtney Phillips033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ruthie Tait
80W–30L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Lauren Clark
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Shannon Miles
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Jaimi Miller
37W–73L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Elizabeth Paul
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Sheryl Norman
53W–65L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Carey Campbell
15W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Courtney Larson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lamanda Petcoff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Brandy Lansford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Courtney Phillips
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Sandra Campisi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Jane Phillips
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Ginny Houghton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Rachel Hollis
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Deanna Bayless
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Hilary Crenshaw
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Leah Grieger
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45
Stacey Weeks
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
Donna Mcwilliams
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.