Teams

West Homewood - Beers

2025 B'ham Winter Weeknight - Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women - Monday

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-23vs YMCA Mt. Brook - VaughnWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Godwin / Valerie Turner vs Emily Vaughn / Yvette Box6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMadison Williams Chen vs Frances Lehman6-1, 6-2
2025-02-04vs BH - Minor/AdamsLost 13
L#1 DoublesErin Clark / Jennifer Griffin vs Ashley Goetz / Lena Martinez6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesValerie Turner / Mary Jane Armstrong vs Sarah Adams / Jade Sipes7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKathryn Fuller vs Dane Hoven0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWhitney Allen / Ally McClendon vs Kristen Riggs / Michelle Watts5-7, 3-6
2025-01-29vs BHRC - GravesWon 50
W#1 DoublesKatherine Arnold / Becca Beers vs Leah Doss / Dannelle Paz7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHazl Carter vs Jessica Dietrich-Marsh6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErin Clark / Jennifer Griffin vs Megan Thrasher / Cheryl Vinyard4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMadison Williams Chen vs April Boswell6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLacey Amos / Taylor Mathwich vs Hanna Salter / Andrea Tatum6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-28vs Gardendale - HargreavesWon 50
W#1 DoublesKatherine Arnold / Jennifer Griffin vs Kerri Hughes / Amanda Wesley6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMadison Williams Chen vs Kelsey King7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBecca Beers / Molly Osborn vs Candace Jones / Susan Creel6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHazl Carter vs Alisha Pickle6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLacey Amos / Caroline Hudson vs Rebecca Horton / Sharon Hargreaves4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-14vs PRC - Holtz/WingateWon 41
W#1 DoublesKatherine Arnold / Molly Osborn vs Gail Bevier / Aaryn Levert-Carter6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesHazl Carter vs Anna Marie Auchmuty4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlly McClendon / Caroline Hudson vs Erin Holtz / Abbey Wingate4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTaylor Mathwich vs Katherine Dearing6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesValerie Turner / Whitney Allen vs Sara Langston / Sydney Anderson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-12vs PRC - LyonsLost 13
L#1 DoublesMolly Osborn / Erin Clark vs Courtney Taylor / Jennifer Cooke1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHazl Carter vs Bethany Bertovic3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Armstrong / Jennifer Griffin vs Robyn Lyons / Billie Caine1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBecca Beers / Erin Godwin vs Michelle Davenport / Lindsey Fehr6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Erin Godwin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Becca Beers
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Taylor Mathwich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.00
Hazl Carter
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.91
Ally McClendon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Valerie Turner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Mary Jane Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Madison Williams Chen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.77
Molly Osborn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Caroline Hudson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Jennifer Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Whitney Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Kathryn Fuller
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Lacey Amos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jane Armstrong + Becca Beers224 matchesnot enough data
Molly Osborn + Becca Beers224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jane Armstrong + Valerie Turner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Godwin
29W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Becca Beers
31W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Taylor Mathwich
30W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.04
3
Hazl Carter
39W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Ally McClendon
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Valerie Turner
29W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Mary Jane Armstrong
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Madison Williams Chen
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Molly Osborn
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Caroline Hudson
13W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Jennifer Griffin
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Whitney Allen
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
Kathryn Fuller
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Lacey Amos
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.