Teams

SFV Chix & Dix Part 2

2023 Mixed 18+ SFV Winter · SFV 18 & Over - 8.0 MxD

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-25vs SFV Toluca Lake LobstahsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Perryman / David McFarland vs Bret Hofstein / Shanna Reznik6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-19vs SFV Serve Ace AahsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathrina Cruz / David Hittelman vs Judy Maly / John Maly5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Parent / Darren Chu vs Victoria Smith / Chris Erickson5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Perryman / Dennis Perryman vs Wangie Pineda / Alain Banas6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-05vs SFV Balboa AvengersLost 01
L#3 DoublesDennis Perryman / Diane Perryman vs Karen Vidal / Guy Vidal5-7, 6-7
2023-01-22vs SFV AV StormersLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Clark / Kathrina Cruz vs Carlos Guarin / Natalia Parra Alvarez2-6, 0-6
2023-01-07vs SFV Rocket RacketsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Perryman / David McFarland vs Shimon Nofar / Barbara Wiesener6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - 8.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Karen Hankinson
published 4.5
4.13
Lily Tucker
published
3.86
Diane Perryman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Darren Chu
published 4
3.78
David McFarland
published 4
3.73
MJ Nejad
published
3.67
Dennis Mitchell
published 4
3.65
Kathrina Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Robin Hittelman
published 4
3.56
Mikaela Nagler
published
3.27
Michelle Parent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mike Levy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathrina Cruz + Darren Chu404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen Hankinson
131W–70L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
4.38
Lily Tucker
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Diane Perryman
91W–104L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Darren Chu
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
David McFarland
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
MJ Nejad
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Dennis Mitchell
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Kathrina Cruz
221W–229L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Robin Hittelman
76W–110L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Mikaela Nagler
26W–40L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Michelle Parent
104W–137L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Mike Levy
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.