Teams

Crooke - SHL

2025 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-11vs Marino - RS ClaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Eric Stewart vs Kevin Groom / Dawn Marino6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichelle Covell / Tyson Dunkelberger vs Cosme Barrios / Van Hughes3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-28vs Miller - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Covell / Eric Stewart vs Lubomir Kaderjak / Akiko Ichimasa0-6, 0-6
2025-07-14vs Escambia/McCall/18&Over8.0XLost 02
L#1 DoublesKen McCurdy / Michelle Covell vs Kyle Ehlers / Whitney Calametti2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Eric Stewart vs Robert Fabbro / Abigail Nelson3-6, 5-7
2025-07-07vs Brown - PCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Nitterauer / Ken McCurdy vs Ansli Brown / Max McCullar6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Tyson Dunkelberger vs Amanda Brown / Connor Teefey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-03vs Richardson - RS ClaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesEric Stewart / Lori Gonzalez vs Thuy Nguyen / Ali Kizilbash6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTyson Dunkelberger / Susan Nitterauer vs Stephen McCrory / Brooklyn Meadows2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Lori Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.30
Jami Steinmetz
published 4.5
4.24
Michelle Covell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
3.97
Susan Nitterauer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Ken McCurdy
published
3.67
Grant Gaston
published 4
3.61
Angela Stewart
published 4
3.36
Eric Stewart
published 3.5
Tyson Dunkelberger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Stewart + Ken McCurdy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Gonzalez
128W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Jami Steinmetz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
Michelle Covell
92W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Shaner Garner Crooke
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Susan Nitterauer
149W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
Ken McCurdy
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Grant Gaston
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Angela Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Eric Stewart
19W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Tyson Dunkelberger
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.