Teams

ALangefeld

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPatricia Zorko / Annette Langefeld vs Donna Garcia / Ginger Sidoti3-6, 3-6
2022-05-02vs BJMarchiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Sauer / Virgina Wilson vs Lori Jones / Betsy Fulcher6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Zorko / Rachel Whidby vs Adela Whitten / Beverly Marchi3-6, 1-6
2022-04-25vs EOsbourneLost 01
L#3 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Annette Langefeld vs Jocelyn Badulis / Catherine Poulter2-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs TLeFevre 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Murphy / Diane Sauer vs Brenda Coules / Martha Zurawel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVirgina Wilson / Kathleen Buckner vs Tara LeFevre / Takako Schenberger6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Patricia Steele vs Deb Lanier / Martha Funsten1-6, 0-6
2022-03-28vs CCOUCH/ALLENWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Sauer / Virgina Wilson vs Sherry Goodson / Heidi Duggins6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Rachel Whidby vs Dorothy Nance / Lynne Allen2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAnnette Langefeld / Patricia Zorko vs Cathy Couch / Laura Bell3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-03-21vs BKellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Sauer / Virgina Wilson vs Sonja Kinzlmaier / Wendy Christensen6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Diane Sauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Virgina Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Patricia Zorko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Karen Maus
published
2.74
Gwen Hedgepeth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Lannie Hoffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Sauer + Virgina Wilson4355% gamesnot enough data
Gwen Hedgepeth + Patricia Zorko314 matchesnot enough data
Gwen Hedgepeth + Virgina Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Sauer
137W–89L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3
Virgina Wilson
50W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.15
3
Patricia Zorko
40W–43L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
Karen Maus
10W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Gwen Hedgepeth
148W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
Lannie Hoffman
4W–17L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.