Teams

40 something

2024 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-13Won 20
W#2 DoublesKathy Brashear / Gina Sharp vs Patricia Bergstrand / Angie O'Hara6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Hopkey / Jody Mallane vs Karen East / Kelly Wedeven6-3, 6-3
2024-05-08Won 10
W#1 SinglesDenise Schwendener vs Anya Sandusky6-2, 6-2
2024-05-01vs Group Therapy 4.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJody Mallane / Susan Hopkey vs Diana Gastanaga / Debbie Merritt7-6, 6-2
2024-04-24vs PTSA 4.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesDenise Schwendener vs Priya Kanaparti6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKerri Porritt / Becca Longson vs Robyn Roby / Ekaterina Baxter7-5, 6-4
2024-04-22vs Klein TBDWon 20
W#1 DoublesJody Mallane / Becca Longson vs Anne Marie Carlisle / Gage Young6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesShelley Ware / Susan Hopkey vs Meg Markley / Ashley Tribble6-2, 6-2
2024-04-17vs Group Therapy 4.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesDenise Schwendener vs Debbie Merritt6-2, 4-0
2024-04-15vs PTSA 4.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesBecca Longson / Gina Sharp vs Robyn Roby / Ekaterina Baxter6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRebecca Newby / Susan Hopkey vs Nicole Hancock / Jessica Jensen6-1, 6-0
2024-04-01Won 20
W#2 DoublesJody Mallane / Becca Longson vs Wendy Anderson / Suzanne Baran6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGina Sharp / Shelley Ware vs Nancy Edwards / Karen East6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
140 something903424165
2PTSA 4.554181839337
3Group Therapy 4.545171941328
4Klein TBD0933368425

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Lauren Drew
published 4.5
4.45
Kathy Brashear
published 4.5
4.44
Rebecca Newby
published 4.5
4.37
Lisa Sliger
published 4.5
4.26
Mila Wood
published 4.5
Becca Longson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Denise Schwendener
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Shelley Ware
published 4.5
4.19
Jody Mallane
published 4.5
4.18
Bobette Wood
published 4.5
4.10
Debbie Wachtell
published 4.5
3.98
Kerri Porritt
published 4.5
Gina Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Hopkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Newby + Bobette Wood12267% games+5.7% vs expected
Jody Mallane + Lisa Sliger15460% games+4.9% vs expected
Kathy Brashear + Bobette Wood351361% games+2.6% vs expected
Jody Mallane + Mila Wood6256% games+0.6% vs expected
Kathy Brashear + Mila Wood9262% games−0.6% vs expected
Kerri Porritt + Bobette Wood6066% games−2.8% vs expected
Bobette Wood + Mila Wood10264% games−4.1% vs expected
Susan Hopkey + Shelley Ware10066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lauren Drew
64W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Kathy Brashear
172W–68L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Rebecca Newby
134W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
4.44
4.5
Lisa Sliger
141W–87L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Mila Wood
118W–84L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Becca Longson
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Denise Schwendener
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Shelley Ware
144W–92L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Jody Mallane
183W–95L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Bobette Wood
280W–114L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Debbie Wachtell
94W–54L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Kerri Porritt
126W–66L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
Gina Sharp
37W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Hopkey
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.