Teams

MCAC:Hall

2025 Cape Tri-Level 18 & Over Women: Summer · 3.0 Women 1

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-25vs MCAC:Silva:FoxLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Hall / Sarah Toadvine vs Carolyn Watts / Ruth Cohen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-18vs WIL:StillwellWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Toadvine / Dawn Hall vs Carolyn Hutchings / Barbara Penn6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesLinda Blood / Lois Riley vs Judith Jamieson / Laine Kotoski2-6, 3-6
2025-05-28vs MCAC:SiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Hall / Sarah Toadvine vs Cindy Sia / Elizabeth Beckhardt6-2, 6-2
2025-05-21vs WIL:StillwellWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Blood / Sarah Toadvine vs Carolyn Hutchings / Laurie Stillwell6-0, 6-3
2025-05-21vs MCAC:Silva:FoxWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Dexter / Dawn Hall vs Ruth Cohen / Carolyn Watts2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLois Riley / Carol Rawlins vs Renate Reithmayr / Natalia Lassor6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-23vs MCAC:SiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Rawlins / Nancy Dexter vs Lisa-Holly Flaherty / Judith Andrews6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Linda Blood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Carol Rawlins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Dawn Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Lois Riley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Dexter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Toadvine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Hall + Sarah Toadvine5260% games+5.5% vs expected
Linda Blood + Dawn Hall9257% gamesnot enough data
Linda Blood + Nancy Dexter6256% gamesnot enough data
Carol Rawlins + Lois Riley3450% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Dexter + Lois Riley3250% gamesnot enough data
Carol Rawlins + Linda Blood123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Rawlins + Nancy Dexter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Blood
40W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Carol Rawlins
46W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Dawn Hall
29W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Lois Riley
25W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Nancy Dexter
43W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Toadvine
32W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.